-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[Merged by Bors] - fix(Finprod): fix a to_additive name
#33638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The lemma and the typo were introduced in leanprover-community#33508
PR summary b66f9a38d1Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>The doc-module for No changes to technical debt.You can run this locally as
|
Contributor
|
bors merge |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2026
The lemma and the typo were introduced in #33508
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
to_additive nameto_additive name
Ruben-VandeVelde
added a commit
to Ruben-VandeVelde/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2026
From leanprover-community#33633, leanprover-community#30563, leanprover-community#33771, leanprover-community#33755, leanprover-community#31988, leanprover-community#33622, leanprover-community#32837, leanprover-community#33638, leanprover-community#33503, leanprover-community#33321, leanprover-community#33242, leanprover-community#32955, leanprover-community#33159, leanprover-community#33152, leanprover-community#33131, leanprover-community#33144, leanprover-community#32116, leanprover-community#31259, leanprover-community#26831, leanprover-community#32917, leanprover-community#32589, leanprover-community#32584, leanprover-community#32562, leanprover-community#32788, and leanprover-community#32568.
bilichboris
pushed a commit
to bilichboris/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2026
From leanprover-community#33633, leanprover-community#30563, leanprover-community#33771, leanprover-community#33755, leanprover-community#31988, leanprover-community#33622, leanprover-community#32837, leanprover-community#33638, leanprover-community#33503, leanprover-community#33321, leanprover-community#33242, leanprover-community#32955, leanprover-community#33159, leanprover-community#33152, leanprover-community#33131, leanprover-community#33144, leanprover-community#32116, leanprover-community#31259, leanprover-community#26831, leanprover-community#32917, leanprover-community#32589, leanprover-community#32584, leanprover-community#32562, leanprover-community#32788, and leanprover-community#32568.
staroperator
pushed a commit
to staroperator/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
From leanprover-community#33633, leanprover-community#30563, leanprover-community#33771, leanprover-community#33755, leanprover-community#31988, leanprover-community#33622, leanprover-community#32837, leanprover-community#33638, leanprover-community#33503, leanprover-community#33321, leanprover-community#33242, leanprover-community#32955, leanprover-community#33159, leanprover-community#33152, leanprover-community#33131, leanprover-community#33144, leanprover-community#32116, leanprover-community#31259, leanprover-community#26831, leanprover-community#32917, leanprover-community#32589, leanprover-community#32584, leanprover-community#32562, leanprover-community#32788, and leanprover-community#32568.
goliath-klein
pushed a commit
to PrParadoxy/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2026
The lemma and the typo were introduced in leanprover-community#33508
goliath-klein
pushed a commit
to PrParadoxy/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2026
From leanprover-community#33633, leanprover-community#30563, leanprover-community#33771, leanprover-community#33755, leanprover-community#31988, leanprover-community#33622, leanprover-community#32837, leanprover-community#33638, leanprover-community#33503, leanprover-community#33321, leanprover-community#33242, leanprover-community#32955, leanprover-community#33159, leanprover-community#33152, leanprover-community#33131, leanprover-community#33144, leanprover-community#32116, leanprover-community#31259, leanprover-community#26831, leanprover-community#32917, leanprover-community#32589, leanprover-community#32584, leanprover-community#32562, leanprover-community#32788, and leanprover-community#32568.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
easy
< 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines.
ready-to-merge
This PR has been sent to bors.
t-algebra
Algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The lemma and the typo were introduced in #33508
Do we need to introduce a deprecated alias? The typo was introduced ~1 day ago.
fix(Finprod): fix a
to_additivenameThe lemma and the typo were introduced in #33508