[#86787] [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC — ko1@...
Issue #14723 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
13 messages
2018/05/01
[#86790] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/01
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#86791] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/05/01
On 2018/05/01 12:18, Eric Wong wrote:
[#86792] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/01
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#86793] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/05/01
On 2018/05/01 12:47, Eric Wong wrote:
[#86794] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/01
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#86814] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/05/02
[#86815] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/02
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#86816] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/05/02
On 2018/05/02 11:49, Eric Wong wrote:
[#86847] [Ruby trunk Bug#14732] CGI.unescape returns different instance between Ruby 2.3 and 2.4 — me@...
Issue #14732 has been reported by jnchito (Junichi Ito).
3 messages
2018/05/02
[#86860] [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC — sam.saffron@...
Issue #14723 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
6 messages
2018/05/03
[#86862] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14723] [WIP] sleepy GC
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/03
sam.saffron@gmail.com wrote:
[#86935] [Ruby trunk Bug#14742] Deadlock when autoloading different constants in the same file from multiple threads — elkenny@...
Issue #14742 has been reported by eugeneius (Eugene Kenny).
5 messages
2018/05/08
[#87030] [Ruby trunk Feature#14757] [PATCH] thread_pthread.c: enable thread caceh by default — normalperson@...
Issue #14757 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/05/15
[#87093] [Ruby trunk Feature#14767] [PATCH] gc.c: use monotonic counters for objspace_malloc_increase — ko1@...
Issue #14767 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/05/17
[#87095] [Ruby trunk Feature#14767] [PATCH] gc.c: use monotonic counters for objspace_malloc_increase — ko1@...
Issue #14767 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
9 messages
2018/05/17
[#87096] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14767] [PATCH] gc.c: use monotonic counters for objspace_malloc_increase
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/17
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#87166] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14767] [PATCH] gc.c: use monotonic counters for objspace_malloc_increase
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/05/18
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#87486] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14767] [PATCH] gc.c: use monotonic counters for objspace_malloc_increase
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/13
I wrote:
[ruby-core:87011] [Ruby trunk Feature#14249] Remove str[match_str]
From:
yugui@...
Date:
2018-05-13 23:32:58 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87011
Issue #14249 has been updated by yugui (Yuki Sonoda).
IIUC, Ana is saying that `str[match_str]` does not make sense because it always returns `match_str`.
But it does make sense because it returns `nil` if `str` does not contain such a substring. i.e. it is useful to test if the string contains a substring.
You would say that `str[regex]` can do the same thing. And theoretically it is true. But it also means you must compile `match_str` into `Regexp` beforehand.
So `str[match_str]` is a convenient (and sometimes more efficient) way to test substrings.
Then, you might say that `str.contains` can do the same thing. And theoretically it is true. Here `str[match_str]` is necessary to just keep compatibility between `String` and `Regexp`.
Since most of all methods in the standard library which expect a pattern of character sequence accepts both of `String` and `Regexp`, it is natural for users to expect that the compatibility is kept in `String#[]` too.
----------------------------------------
Feature #14249: Remove str[match_str]
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14249#change-71978
* Author: ana06 (Ana Maria Martinez Gomez)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I wonder if `str[match_str]` makes sense.
``` Ruby
"ana"['a'] => "a"
```
I would say this is not expected and it brings problems, for example when accessing nested hashes. For example:
``` Ruby
params = { "user" => "Nicolas Cage" } => {"user"=>"Nicolas Cage"}
params["user"]["age"] => "age"
```
I think `str[regexp]` is enough and that `str[match_str]` can be removed.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>