Meng Abrams M1A2 SEP Tusk II Build in 1/72 Scale

Every manufacturer in the 1/72 armor game seems to have issued an M1 Abrams in one version or another, often many types. In 2023 Meng threw their hat into the ring with their M1A2 SEP Tusk II. This kit looks great in the (end opening) box, let’s see what’s inside.
The hull is built up from flat pieces, a perfectly reasonable approach given the low-slung design of the Abrams. The parts are well-molded with sharp details and are flash-free.
Tracks are molded in sections, there are no individual links to assemble as the runs over the drive and return rollers are molded in short, curved sections.
I assembled the hull tub and weighted it with BBs and casting resin to give it some heft.
Here is a simple trick to get the gears on the drive sprockets to align properly using a drill bit as a guide. When the bit rests perpendicular to the sides of the sprocket your gear teeth will line up and the track will fit properly.
The kit goes together well with no surprises. The kit has the option to pose the turret hatches open, but any crew figures will have to be sourced separately. I have gone around the edges of the armored glass panels with a black Sharpie to eliminate refractions and masked the panels with Tamiya Tape.
The model was sprayed with a thin layer of Mr. Surfacer 1000 to check for flaws. The only fit issue on my build was the tabs holding the turret in place had to be shaved back to allow the turret to rotate.
The color is tan, tan is the color. Not a lot to this camo but it looks good on an Abrams!
There are a few ammo boxes and Jerry cans included with the Meng Abrams but not much else in terms of stowage. I supplemented these with Value Gear and Dragon bits along with some masking tape tarp rolls to fill up the bustle. The Meng kit fits great, goes together well, and looks the part when done.

Completed model photos here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2025/11/18/meng-abrams-m1a2-sep-tusk-ii-in-1-72-scale/

Tankenstein Vehicles of the Russia Ukrainian War Part VII

Welcome to the seventh installment of the Tankenstein Vehicles of the Russia Ukrainian War series, we’ll call this one the “bad hair day” edition.  Passive drone defenses have become standard equipment, but the actual construction is anything but standard, plus there are a few vehicles from earlier in the conflict.  All make for interesting modeling projects for scratch building and conversions.

That’s dread, mon! This crew has added steal cable “dreadlocks” to a typical “cope cage”, providing layered anti-drone protection. The cables form a barrier while still retaining their flexibility and not impairing movement of the turret. Plate armor covers the running gear.
Another version of wire cables protect this T-72. The reactive armor on the side skirts has been augmented with unwound wire rope “split ends”. Camouflage netting and a mine plow complete the look, suggesting this vehicle may be intended for breakthrough operations.
Another view of the same T-72 from the rear, showing the unwound cable has also been applied to the overhead protection. Multiple views of the same vehicle are invaluable for modeling purposes.
Business in the front, party in the rear! This T-72 wears a mullet constructed of steel cables along with additional side skirts.
A factory fresh BMP-2 with a high cope cage and netting. Slat armor on the hull was originally conceived as protection against RPG rounds, but all these measures are potentially effective against both drones and missiles of many types.
This T-80 employs a variety of protective measures to increase survivability. Reactive armor covers the hull and turret. The cope cage has been enhanced with wire netting, the hull sides are protected with slat armor. Rubber skirts have been added to the hull front, and camouflage netting helps reduce visibility.
A view of captured Russian vehicles from the early stages of the Special Military Action. The two MT-LB APCs in the center are interesting for their twin 14.5mm machine gun mounts, both of which are types normally carried aboard naval vessels. Vehicles armed with re-purposed naval weapons systems are not uncommon, se previous postings for more examples.
The Ukrainians have also fielded modifications to their fleet of MT-LBs. This one sports a Grad rocket launcher. Grads have been added to a variety of platforms including pickup trucks.
This Russian Msta-S 152mm self-propelled howitzer is equipped with both a cope cage and rubber sheets to protect the turret. This vehicle is typically a Divisional asset and would normally be expected to operate behind the front lines, the added protection is a testament to the reach of drones on the battlefield.
Diorama bait! These two tanks appear to have had a junkyard dropped on them! Crews are improvising protection from any scavenged materials likely to afford even a small bit of enhanced protection.

Part I here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2023/05/24/tankenstein-vehicles-of-the-russia-ukrainian-war-part-i/

Canadair CL-415 Fire Bombers of Bridger Aerospace Part IV – Interior

Photographs taken by Don Gilman at Easterwood Field, College Station, Texas.

Part I here: Part I here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2025/10/12/canadair-cl-415-fire-bombers-of-bridger-aerospace-part-i/

Don Gilman wishes to thank:

Chasen Urban of the US Forest Service, https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire

Captain Brian Iriks of Bridger Aerospace, https://bridgeraerospace.com/

and Lindee and John from Austin Aviation, https://www.astinaviation.com/

Canadair CL-415 Fire Bombers of Bridger Aerospace Part III

Photographs taken by Don Gilman at Easterwood Field, College Station, Texas.

Part IV Interior photos here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2025/10/27/canadair-cl-415-fire-bombers-of-bridger-aerospace-part-iv-interior/

Don Gilman wishes to thank:

Chasen Urban of the US Forest Service, https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire

Captain Brian Iriks of Bridger Aerospace, https://bridgeraerospace.com/

and Lindee and John from Austin Aviation, https://www.astinaviation.com/

Women Warriors 343

IDF
Romania
A-10 pilot Kim Campbell
New Zealand 2LT Wallace
Ukrainian Sniper Evgenia Emerald
USAF
IDF
Sofija Jovanovic Krsmanovic, Serbian Army WWI
Germany
Army Capt Justine Bolten
Norway
USAF T-38
IDF
USMC
China
WWI Ambulance Driver Wilhelmina Drummond Harland
Pakistan
Norway
Austria
IDF
HRH Princess Ingrid of Norway
US Army Captain inside a UH60 Blackhawk in Iraq
Serbia
USAF Capt. Laney Schol – F-35 pilot, Eglin Air Force Base, March 24, 2022
USAF
ATS girls using an identification telescope (IWM)
Israeli Air Force
France
Officer using stadimeter aboard USS McCampbell (DDG 85)
USMC Lance Cpl. Amber Duggins, OPFOR during exercise at Camp Pendleton
Columbian Col EJC DIVAEREA
Capt. Cathyrine Armandie, F-15E Strike Eagle Weapons System Officer
French Air Force
ATS Dispatch Rider 1943
WREN cleaning a Lewis gun aboard a coastal craft. (IWM)
Corporal Clara Grundon Women’s Army Corps 1944
ww569_USArmy
US Army
ww569b_IDF
IDF
ww569c_CVN74
US Navy sailor aboard the aircraft carrier John C. Stennis (CVN-74)
ww569d_KurdishYPG
Kurdish YPJ
ww569e_USN_RAN
USN and RAN quartermasters
ww570_Serbia
Serbia
ww571_Dutch
Holland
ww571_USMC_F35B_MelanieZiebart
USMC F-35B pilot Melanie Ziebart
ww572_ATS
Australia
Women with a Will to Win!
Women with a Will to Win!
ww369
USAF
ww370
M-60
x-default
Sweden
ww372
Jadwiga Pilsudska, Polish ATA Pilot
Poster093
ww169
IDF
ww170
Chinese PLA
ww171
Turkey
ww172CanadianWAC1
Canadian WAC operating foot pump
Poster043_WAAAF3

For more Women Warriors, click on the tag below:

Dragon M2A2 Bradley Build in 1/72 Scale

Dragon issued their M2A2 Bradley kit in 2004 and has reboxed their sprues with various additions regularly ever since. Many of these use the same box art but can feature additional parts, so be sure to check the fine print to see what’s in the box. Recent editions contain resin printed interiors which open up a whole new range of display opportunities.
The sprues contain a multitude of finely-detailed parts, the molding is crisp with little flash. The turret hatch can be posed open, but there is no interior on either of these boxings, and if you want crew figures they will have to be sourced elsewhere.
The hull comes in two pieces of slide-molded goodness. The DS tracks respond well to most modeling glues, but exercise care if using thin glues as these can dissolve the tracks if too much is applied.
The ERA blocks are on an additional sprue and some parts are modified to account for the differences in vehicle types. The stowage is nicely molded in a flexible vinyl, these are useful sprues for a variety of modern vehicles and a nice bonus.
The lower hull has the torsion arms molded in place, I prefer this approach as it results in a strong assembly and eliminates one source of potential alignment problems. Here I have used stretched sprue to fill holes in the bottom of the hull, these are melted in place with thin glue and form a tight bond.
Both hulls were weighted with BBs fixed in place with casting resin. If you use this method you must ensure all the gaps and holes are filled tightly as the resin will seep through even the tiniest of openings.
Here are the hulls during assembly with the running gear in place. The biggest problem in getting these kits together is Dragon’s famously ambiguous instructions which can leave you guessing if you’re not careful.
All the lifting eyes were cut off and replaced with wire, the antenna bases were drilled out and thin Albion tube inserted.
Both kits were primed with Mr. Surfacer 1000.
Here are the colors used. It was not unusual to see vehicles deployed with mixtures of woodland and desert camouflaged components.
Both Bradleys together with Nitenol antennas and external stowage. The stowage has additional straps made from Tamiya tape, “magnetic stowage” is a pet peeve of mine. These are good kits but the instructions could be better, I might try another someday with the interior set and a full complement of figures.

Finished model photos here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2025/11/11/dragon-m2a2-bradley-in-1-72-scale/

Tankenstein Vehicles of the Russia Ukrainian War Part VI

The sixth installment of vehicle modifications from the Russia Ukrainian War, this one focusses on the measures taken to protect vehicles from the ever-increasing drone threat.  From factory-installed “cope cages” to field expedient junkyard armor these efforts reflect both ingenuity and desperation.  Modified vehicles make for interesting and unique modeling subjects, for more of these “Tankenstein” subjects follow the links at the bottom of the posts.

This is a Russian Uraltransmash 2S19 Msta-S 152.4 mm self-propelled howitzer, which is based on a modified T-72 / T-80 chassis. Here the crew has fitted a cope cage for overhead protection augmented with rubber sheets. Camouflage netting and tarps have also been added to break up the vehicle’s outline.
This Ukrainian Humvee is protected by a rather neatly manufactured wire cage.
Another Ukrainian Humvee, but this one is not so neat. The “porcupine” armor is supplemented by wire netting and plating over the wheels.
The Russian BREM series are armored recovery vehicles based upon standard tank chassis of various marks. This example does not carry the expected engineering fittings generally seen on the BREM series and may in fact have been modified for use as a remote-controlled explosive drone. The overhead protection is flat panels supplemented with wire cable porcupines.
A new production Russian BMD-4M amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, the slat armor on the hull and wire cope cage on the turret are factory fittings.
A Russian 9K37 Buk (NATO SA-11 Gadfly) medium range surface to air missile system with supplemental armor, cope cage, and camouflage netting. The Buk system has undergone an extended series of upgrades and modifications over the years and a bewildering number of designations.
Due to high levels of vehicle attrition, the Russians have been obliged to recondition several types of obsolete tanks for front-line service. This is a T-55 with an improvised cope cage, initial production versions of the T-54/55 first entered service in 1948!
A trio of T-72s advance along a dirt roadway, presenting a good view of their overhead slat protection. While there does not appear to be a “standard” cope cage design, this is one of the more commonly seen patterns.
A Russian T-80BV with an extensive array of reactive armor blocks around the turret. This tank has a “lived-in” appearance, complete with damage to the rear skirts protecting the running gear.
I’m not sure what this vehicle is or even how the crew gets into it. Visible here are rubber mats (or steel panels) wire net, porcupine bars, and razor wire. The ability to employ the vehicle’s weapons (if any) or even see out of it are definitely compromised, but the vulnerability to drone attack has hopefully been reduced!

Part VII here: https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2025/10/29/tankenstein-vehicles-of-the-russia-ukrainian-war-part-vii/

Share this: