fix(parsing): Timestamp error handling in dnstap parser#23072
Merged
pront merged 5 commits intovectordotdev:masterfrom Jun 10, 2025
Merged
fix(parsing): Timestamp error handling in dnstap parser#23072pront merged 5 commits intovectordotdev:masterfrom
pront merged 5 commits intovectordotdev:masterfrom
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
38fc53d to
766fdd2
Compare
pront
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2025
Merged
via the queue into
vectordotdev:master
with commit Jun 10, 2025
f84dbbc
41 of 42 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
After my checks for illegal math I found one more testcase with panic. Now timestamp function returns
Result<()>(#23048) and we can feel free to pass some errors outside.Change Type
Is this a breaking change?
How did you test this PR?
Raw testcase:
Trace:
Also can check this behavior by removing changes in function but not remove new testcase.
Does this PR include user facing changes?
Notes
@vectordotdev/vectorto reach out to us regarding this PR.pre-pushhook, please see this template.cargo fmt --allcargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warningscargo nextest run --workspace(alternatively, you can runcargo test --all)./scripts/check_changelog_fragments.shgit merge origin masterandgit push.Cargo.lock), pleaserun
cargo vdev build licensesto regenerate the license inventory and commit the changes (if any). More details here.References
Additional fix to #23048