Skip to content

Conversation

@RingsC
Copy link
Contributor

@RingsC RingsC commented May 25, 2023

Summary about this PR

In result value setup phase, it only deals with num, but in some case, some non-num types involved, therefore, we should also deal with these types.
Issue Number: close #1808 #1788

Tests Check List

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Changelog

  • New Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Performance Improvement
  • Build/Testing/CI/CD
  • Documentation
  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented May 25, 2023

This pull request's title should follow requirements next. @RingsC please check it 👇.

Valid format:

fix(vc): fix sth..... (#3306)
  ^         ^---------^  ^----^
  |         |            |
  |         +            +-> you issue id.
  |         |
  |         +-> Summary in present tense.
  |
  +-------> Type: feat, fix, docs, workflow, style, refactor, test, website, chore

Valid types:

  • feat: new feature for stonedb
  • fix: bug fix for stonedb
  • docs: changes to the documentation
  • workflow: ci/cd in .github
  • perf: Changes to improve code performance
  • refactor: refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable
  • style: formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no production code change
  • test: adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change
  • website
  • chore: updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented May 25, 2023

Thanks for the contribution!
I have applied any labels matching special text in your PR Changelog.

Please review the labels and make any necessary changes.

@RingsC RingsC changed the title fxi(tianmu): fix up the incompatible type fix(tianmu): fix up the incompatible type May 25, 2023
@mergify mergify bot added the PR-bug bug for pull request label May 25, 2023
@RingsC RingsC marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2023 13:18
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 81.81% and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (69a49bd) 55.04% compared to head (9dfe0cd) 55.01%.

❗ Current head 9dfe0cd differs from pull request most recent head d81fd36. Consider uploading reports for the commit d81fd36 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           stonedb-5.7-dev    #1824      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            55.04%   55.01%   -0.03%     
===================================================
  Files                 2031     2031              
  Lines               431436   431442       +6     
===================================================
- Hits                237495   237377     -118     
- Misses              193941   194065     +124     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
storage/tianmu/core/temp_table.cpp 71.69% <81.81%> (-0.54%) ⬇️

... and 134 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@hustjieke hustjieke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

RingsC and others added 2 commits May 26, 2023 09:52
1) In result value setup phase, it only deals with num, but in some case, some non-num types
involved, therefore, we should also deal with these types.

2) To fixup the boundary of the error codes.
@RingsC RingsC linked an issue May 26, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2579bd4 into stoneatom:stonedb-5.7-dev May 26, 2023
@RingsC RingsC deleted the fix-type-incompatible-in-union-all branch May 26, 2023 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR-bug bug for pull request

Projects

None yet

3 participants