Conversation
Alveel
changed the title
Author
|
Perhaps instead we can create a symbolic link to ZDOTDIR? Honestly that sounds pretty logical. I'll see if I can update and test. |
Author
|
After some more thinking and tinkering, using a symbolic link may not be the greatest idea after all. This script would then also overwrite the existing |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dependent files can be present in
ZDOTDIRif the user has configured it. This PR simply copies its contents.I realise this is not an optimal solution; if you have a lot of plugins in
ZDOTDIR, copying it in its entirety may bring considerable overhead.However, it does effectively solve the reported problem.
This fixes #132
Feedback more than welcome! 🙂