Add import tests

[moshemorad]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new test file validates that the initial imports and certificate-handling boilerplate in src/robusta/runner/main.py match an expected sequence. The test ensures specific import order and custom certificate logic placement before other code.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
New test file for import validation tests/test_app_imports.py	Adds parametrized test that validates exact sequence of initial lines in src/robusta/runner/main.py, including import statements and certificate-handling boilerplate, with detailed mismatch error reporting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

• Verify that the EXPECTED_LINES sequence matches the current actual first lines of src/robusta/runner/main.py
• Confirm the parametrization correctly targets the intended file path and file name
• Review the assertion logic and error message formatting for clarity

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author. While the check is described as "very lenient" and typically passes if not off-topic, the explicit criteria for passing requires that "the description is related in some way to the changeset." An empty or missing description cannot be related to anything, creating ambiguity about whether this scenario should pass the lenient standard or fail the relatedness requirement. This falls outside the clearly defined pass/fail scenarios in the evaluation criteria.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "Add import tests" directly and clearly describes the main change in the pull request—the addition of a new test file for validating imports and certificate handling in application source files. The title is concise, specific, and easy to understand in context; a teammate scanning commit history would immediately recognize this adds import-related tests. The title is neither vague nor misleading, and accurately captures the primary change from the developer's perspective.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch add_test_imports

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/test_app_imports.py (1)

19-24: Consider simplifying or documenting the single-case parametrization.

Using @pytest.mark.parametrize with only one test case is unusual. If this is preparing for future expansion to test multiple files, consider adding a comment. Otherwise, the test could be simplified by removing the parametrization.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4ce007 and 2deb7e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/test_app_imports.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: run_tests
• GitHub Check: run_tests

🔇 Additional comments (2)

tests/test_app_imports.py (2)

1-2: LGTM!

Standard imports are appropriate for the test functionality.

---

4-16: LGTM!

The hardcoded expected lines enforce strict ordering of certificate handling before other imports, which is appropriate given the critical security context mentioned in the comments.