Tdrz/memexp #219
Closed
Tdrz/memexp #219
+148,849
−111,964
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The SQL spec mandates that SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION implies
SET ROLE NONE. We tried to implement that within the lowest-level
functions that manipulate these settings, but that was a bad idea.
In particular, guc.c assumes that it doesn't matter in what order
it applies GUC variable updates, but that was not the case for these
two variables. This problem, compounded by some hackish attempts to
work around it, led to some security-grade issues:
* Rolling back a transaction that had done SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
would revert to SET ROLE NONE, even if that had not been the previous
state, so that the effective user ID might now be different from what
it had been.
* The same for SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION in a function SET clause.
* If a parallel worker inspected current_setting('role'), it saw
"none" even when it should see something else.
Also, although the parallel worker startup code intended to cope
with the current role's pg_authid row having disappeared, its
implementation of that was incomplete so it would still fail.
Fix by fully separating the miscinit.c functions that assign
session_authorization from those that assign role. To implement the
spec's requirement, teach set_config_option itself to perform "SET
ROLE NONE" when it sets session_authorization. (This is undoubtedly
ugly, but the alternatives seem worse. In particular, there's no way
to do it within assign_session_authorization without incompatible
changes in the API for GUC assign hooks.) Also, improve
ParallelWorkerMain to directly set all the relevant user-ID variables
instead of relying on some of them to get set indirectly. That
allows us to survive not finding the pg_authid row during worker
startup.
In v16 and earlier, this includes back-patching 9987a7b which
fixed a violation of GUC coding rules: SetSessionAuthorization
is not an appropriate place to be throwing errors from.
Security: CVE-2024-10978
meson makes the backslashes in text2macro.pl's --strip argument into forward slashes, effectively disabling comment stripping. That hasn't caused us issues before, but it breaks the test case for b7e3a52. We don't really need the pattern to be adjustable, so just hard-wire it into the script instead. Context: mesonbuild/meson#1564 Security: CVE-2024-10979
TestUpgradeXversion knows how to make the main regression database's references to pg_regress.so be version-independent. But it doesn't do that for plperl's database, so that the C function added by commit b7e3a52 is causing cross-version upgrade test failures. Path of least resistance is to just drop the function at the end of the new test. In <= v14, also take the opportunity to clean up the generated test files. Security: CVE-2024-10979
…cks. Commit 5a2fed9 had an unexpected side-effect: the parallel worker launched for the new test case would fail if it couldn't use a superuser-reserved connection slot. The reason that test failed while all our pre-existing ones worked is that the connection privilege tests in InitPostgres had been based on the superuserness of the leader's AuthenticatedUserId, but after the rearrangements of 5a2fed9 we were testing the superuserness of CurrentUserId, which the new test case deliberately made to be a non-superuser. This all seems very accidental and probably not the behavior we really want, but a security patch is no time to be redesigning things. Pending some discussion about desirable semantics, hack it so that InitPostgres continues to pay attention to the superuserness of AuthenticatedUserId when starting a parallel worker. Nathan Bossart and Tom Lane, per buildfarm member sawshark. Security: CVE-2024-10978
The current code calls array_eq() and does not provide FmgrInfo. This commit provides initialization of FmgrInfo and uses C collation as the safe option for text comparison because we don't know anything about the semantics of opclass options. Backpatch to 13, where opclass options were introduced. Reported-by: Nicolas Maus Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18692-72ea398df3ec6712%40postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
Maintain the pg_stat_user_indexes.idx_scan pgstat counter during contrib/Bloom index scans. Oversight in commit 9ee014f, which added the Bloom index contrib module. Author: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c48839d881388ee401a01807c686004d@oss.nttdata.com Backpatch: 13- (all supported branches).
This fixes a set of race conditions with cumulative statistics where a shared stats entry could be dropped while it should still be valid in the event when it is reused: an entry may refer to a different object but requires the same hash key. This can happen with various stats kinds, like: - Replication slots that compute internally an index number, for different slot names. - Stats kinds that use an OID in the object key, where a wraparound causes the same key to be used if an OID is used for the same object. - As of PostgreSQL 18, custom pgstats kinds could also be an issue, depending on their implementation. This issue is fixed by introducing a counter called "generation" in the shared entries via PgStatShared_HashEntry, initialized at 0 when an entry is created and incremented when the same entry is reused, to avoid concurrent issues on drop because of other backends still holding a reference to it. This "generation" is copied to the local copy that a backend holds when looking at an object, then cross-checked with the shared entry to make sure that the entry is not dropped even if its "refcount" justifies that if it has been reused. This problem could show up when a backend shuts down and needs to discard any entries it still holds, causing statistics to be removed when they should not, or even an assertion failure. Another report involved a failure in a standby after an OID wraparound, where the startup process would FATAL on a "can only drop stats once", stopping recovery abruptly. The buildfarm has been sporadically complaining about the problem, as well, but the window is hard to reach with the in-core tests. Note that the issue can be reproduced easily by adding a sleep before dshash_find() in pgstat_release_entry_ref() to enlarge the problematic window while repeating test_decoding's isolation test oldest_xmin a couple of times, for example, as pointed out by Alexander Lakhin. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin, Peter Smith Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KxuMVyAryz_Vk5yq3ejgKYcL6F45Hj9ZnMNBS-g+PuZg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17947-b9554521ad963c9c@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 15
Previously, in unlucky cases, it was possible for pg_rewind to remove certain WAL segments from the rewound demoted primary. In particular this happens if those files have been marked for archival (i.e., their .ready files were created) but not yet archived; the newly promoted node no longer has such files because of them having been recycled, but they are likely critical for recovery in the demoted node. If pg_rewind removes them, recovery is not possible anymore. Fix this by maintaining a hash table of files in this situation in the scan that looks for a checkpoint, which the decide_file_actions phase can consult so that it knows to preserve them. Backpatch to 14. The problem also exists in 13, but that branch was not blessed with commit eb00f1d, so this patch is difficult to apply there. Users of older releases will just have to continue to be extra careful when rewinding. Co-authored-by: Полина Бунгина (Polina Bungina) <bungina@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Atsushi Torikoshi <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAtGL4AhzmBRsEsaDdz7065T+k+BscNadfTqP1NcPmsqwA5HBw@mail.gmail.com
In commit 08c0d6a which introduced "rainbow" arcs in regex NFAs, I didn't think terribly hard about what to do when creating the color complement of a rainbow arc. Clearly, the complement cannot match any characters, and I took the easy way out by just not building any arcs at all in the complement arc set. That mostly works, but Nikolay Shaplov found a case where it doesn't: if we decide to delete that sub-NFA later because it's inside a "{0}" quantifier, delsub() suffered an assertion failure. That's because delsub() relies on the target sub-NFA being fully connected. That was always true before, and the best fix seems to be to restore that property. Hence, invent a new arc type CANTMATCH that can be generated in place of an empty color complement, and drop it again later when we start NFA optimization. (At that point we don't need to do delsub() any more, and besides there are other cases where NFA optimization can lead to disconnected subgraphs.) It appears that this bug has no consequences in a non-assert-enabled build: there will be some transiently leaked NFA states/arcs, but they'll get cleaned up eventually. Still, we don't like assertion failures, so back-patch to v14 where rainbow arcs were introduced. Per bug #18708 from Nikolay Shaplov. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18708-f94f2599c9d2c005@postgresql.org
…kwards. Previously LogicalIncreaseRestartDecodingForSlot() accidentally accepted any LSN as the candidate_lsn and candidate_valid after the restart_lsn of the replication slot was updated, so it potentially caused the restart_lsn to move backwards. A scenario where this could happen in logical replication is: after a logical replication restart, based on previous candidate_lsn and candidate_valid values in memory, the restart_lsn advances upon receiving a subscriber acknowledgment. Then, logical decoding restarts from an older point, setting candidate_lsn and candidate_valid based on an old RUNNING_XACTS record. Subsequent subscriber acknowledgments then update the restart_lsn to an LSN older than the current value. In the reported case, after WAL files were removed by a checkpoint, the retreated restart_lsn prevented logical replication from restarting due to missing WAL segments. This change essentially modifies the 'if' condition to 'else if' condition within the function. The previous code had an asymmetry in this regard compared to LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot(), which does almost the same thing for different fields. The WAL removal issue was reported by Hubert Depesz Lubaczewski. Backpatch to all supported versions, since the bug exists since 9.4 where logical decoding was introduced. Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yz2hivgyjS1RfMKs%40depesz.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/85fff40e-148b-4e86-b921-b4b846289132%40vondra.me Backpatch-through: 13
After commit 5a2fed9, the catalog state resulting from these commands ceased to affect sessions. Restore the longstanding behavior, which is like beginning the session with a SET ROLE command. If cherry-picking the CVE-2024-10978 fixes, default to including this, too. (This fixes an unintended side effect of fixing CVE-2024-10978.) Back-patch to v12, like that commit. The release team decided to include v12, despite the original intent to halt v12 commits earlier this week. Tom Lane and Noah Misch. Reported by Etienne LAFARGE. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADOZwSb0UsEr4_UTFXC5k7=fyyK8uKXekucd+-uuGjJsGBfxgw@mail.gmail.com
Commits aac2c9b et al. added a bool field to struct ResultRelInfo. That's no problem in the master branch, but in released branches care must be taken when modifying publicly-visible structs to avoid an ABI break for extensions. Frequently we solve that by adding the new field at the end of the struct, and that's what was done here. But ResultRelInfo has stricter constraints than just about any other node type in Postgres. Some executor APIs require extensions to index into arrays of ResultRelInfo, which means that any change whatever in sizeof(ResultRelInfo) causes a fatal ABI break. Fortunately, this is easy to fix, because the new field can be squeezed into available padding space instead --- indeed, that's where it was put in master, so this fix also removes a cross-branch coding variation. Per report from Pavan Deolasee. Patch v14-v17 only; earlier versions did not gain the extra field, nor is there any problem in master. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdNmVBC1LL6pY26dyxAS2f+gLZvTsNt=2XbcyG7WxXVBBQ@mail.gmail.com
In the dim past we figured it was okay to ignore collations when combining UNION set-operation nodes into a single N-way UNION operation. I believe that was fine at the time, but it stopped being fine when we added nondeterministic collations: the semantics of distinct-ness are affected by those. v17 made it even less fine by allowing per-child sorting operations to be merged via MergeAppend, although I think we accidentally avoided any live bug from that. Add a check that collations match before deciding that two UNION nodes are equivalent. I also failed to resist the temptation to comment plan_union_children() a little better. Back-patch to all supported branches (v13 now), since they all have nondeterministic collations. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3605568.1731970579@sss.pgh.pa.us
In 17~, age(xid) and mxid_age(xid) were listed as deprecated. Based on the discussion that led to 48b5aa3, this is not intentional as this could break many existing monitoring queries. Note that vacuumdb also uses both of them. In 16, both functions were listed under "Control Data Functions", which is incorrect, so let's move them to the list of functions related to transaction IDs and snapshots. Author: Bertrand Drouvot Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zzr2zZFyeFKXWe8a@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231114013224.4z6oxa6p6va33rxr@awork3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: 16
Ordinarily transformSetOperationTree will collect all UNION/ INTERSECT/EXCEPT steps into the setOperations tree of the topmost Query, so that leaf queries do not contain any setOperations. However, it cannot thus flatten a subquery that also contains WITH, ORDER BY, FOR UPDATE, or LIMIT. I (tgl) forgot that in commit 07b4c48 and wrote an assertion in rule deparsing that a leaf's setOperations would always be empty. If it were nonempty then we would want to parenthesize the subquery to ensure that the output represents the setop nesting correctly (e.g. UNION below INTERSECT had better get parenthesized). So rather than just removing the faulty Assert, let's change it into an additional case to check to decide whether to add parens. We don't expect that the additional case will ever fire, but it's cheap insurance. Man Zeng and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_7ABF9B1F23B0C77606FC5FE3@qq.com
Not a JSON boolean. Also clarify that other predicate check expressions functions return a JSON boolean, not an SQL boolean. Reported-by: jian he Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxH7tP1NXCHN1bUBXcEB=dv7-qE+ZjB3UxwK6Em+9Qzb9Q@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
RelationSyncCache, the hash table in charge of tracking the relation schemas sent through pgoutput, was forgetting to free the TupleDesc associated to the two slots used to store the new and old tuples, causing some memory to be leaked each time a relation is invalidated when the slots of an existing relation entry are cleaned up. This is rather hard to notice as the bloat is pretty minimal, but a long-running WAL sender would be in trouble over time depending on the workload. sysbench has proved to be pretty good at showing the problem, coupled with some memory monitoring of the WAL sender. Issue introduced in 52e4f0c, that has added row filters for tables logically replicated. Author: Boyu Yang Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Hou Zhijie Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DM3PR84MB3442E14B340E553313B5C816E3252@DM3PR84MB3442.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Backpatch-through: 15
Apparently this information has been outdated since first committed, because we adopted a different implementation during development per reviews and this detail was not updated in the README. This has been wrong since commit 0ac5ad5 introduced the file in 2013. Backpatch to all live branches. Reported-by: Will Mortensen <will@extrahop.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMpnoC6yEQ=c0Rdq-J7uRedrP7Zo9UMp6VZyP23QMT68n06cvA@mail.gmail.com
It failed to set the archive_command as it desired because of a syntax problem. Oversight in commit 90bcc7c. This bug doesn't cause the test to fail, because the test only checks pg_rewind's output messages, not the actual outcome (and the outcome in both cases is that the file is kept, not deleted). But in either case the message about the file being kept is there, so it's hard to get excited about doing much more. Reported-by: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> Author: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7822.1732167825@antos
If the executable's .o files were produced by a compiler (probably gcc) not using -moutline-atomics, and the corresponding .bc files were produced by clang using -moutline-atomics (probably by default), then the generated bitcode functions would have the target attribute "+outline-atomics", and could fail at runtime when inlined. If the target ISA at bitcode generation time was armv8-a (the most conservative aarch64 target, no LSE), then LLVM IR atomic instructions would generate calls to functions in libgcc.a or libclang_rt.*.a that switch between LL/SC and faster LSE instructions depending on a runtime AT_HWCAP check. Since the corresponding .o files didn't need those functions, they wouldn't have been included in the executable, and resolution would fail. At least Debian and Ubuntu are known to ship gcc and clang compilers that target armv8-a but differ on the use of outline atomics by default. Fix, by suppressing the outline atomics attribute in bitcode explicitly. Inline LL/SC instructions will be generated for atomic operations in bitcode built for armv8-a. Only configure scripts are adjusted for now, because the meson build system doesn't generate bitcode yet. This doesn't seem to be a new phenomenon, so real cases of functions using atomics that are inlined by JIT must be rare in the wild given how long it took for a bug report to arrive. The reported case could be reduced to: postgres=# set jit_inline_above_cost = 0; SET postgres=# set jit_above_cost = 0; SET postgres=# select pg_last_wal_receive_lsn(); WARNING: failed to resolve name __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel FATAL: fatal llvm error: Program used external function '__aarch64_swp4_acq_rel' which could not be resolved! The change doesn't affect non-ARM systems or later target ISAs. Back-patch to all supported releases. Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin <a.kozhemyakin@postgrespro.ru> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18610-37bf303f904fede3%40postgresql.org
psql's --help was missed the description of the \pset variable xheader_width, that should be listed when using \? or --help=commands, and described for --help=variables. Oversight in a45388d. Author: Pavel Luzanov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1e3e06d6-0807-4e62-a9f6-c11481e6eb10@postgrespro.ru Backpatch-through: 16
If a user started a bulk write operation on a fork with existing data to append data in bulk, the bulk_write machinery would zero out all previously written pages up to the last page written by the new bulk_write operation. This is not an issue for PostgreSQL itself, because we never use the bulk_write facility on a non-empty fork. But there are use cases where it makes sense. TimescaleDB extension is known to do that to merge partitions, for example. Backpatch to v17, where the bulk_write machinery was introduced. Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> Reported-By: Erik Nordström <erik@timescale.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Nordström <erik@timescale.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACAa4VJ%2BQY4pY7M0ECq29uGkrOygikYtao1UG9yCDFosxaps9g@mail.gmail.com
Commit d39a49c added new fields to the struct, but missed the "keep these last" comment on the previous fields. Add placeholder variables so that the offsets of the fields are the same whether you build with USE_OPENSSL or not. This is a courtesy to extensions that might peek at the fields, to make the ABI the same regardless of the options used to build PostgreSQL. In reality, I don't expect any extensions to look at the 'raw_buf' fields. Firstly, they are new in v17, so no one's written such extensions yet. Secondly, extensions should have no business poking at those fields anyway. Nevertheless, fix this properly on 'master'. On v17, we mustn't change the memory layout, so just fix the comments. Author: Jacob Champion Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/raw/CAOYmi%2BmKVJNzn5_TD_MK%3DhqO64r_w8Gb0FHCLk0oAkW-PJv8jQ@mail.gmail.com
Per PEP 3114, iterator.next() has been renamed to iterator.__next__(), and one example in the documentation still used next(). This caused the example provided to fail the function creation since Python 2 is not supported anymore since 19252e8. Author: Erik Wienhold Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/173209043143.2092749.13692266486972491694@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 15
Updated to specify that it represents the exact time a slot became inactive, rather than the period of inactivity. Reported-by: Peter Smith Author: Bruce Momjian, Nisha Moond Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Peter Smith Backpatch-through: 17 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PuvsyA5v8y7rYoY9mkDQzUhwaESM05yCByTMaDoRh30tA@mail.gmail.com
|
Thanks for your Pull Request! 😄 This repo on GitHub is just a mirror of our real git repositories though, and can't really handle PRs. 😦 Hopefully you can redo the PR, and direct it to the git.postgresql.org repos? We have a developer guide, if that helps: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/So,_you_want_to_be_a_developer%3F. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.