Skip to content

[stable10] Lazy connect to federated share, not in storage constructor#29314

Merged
PVince81 merged 1 commit intostable10from
stable10-lazy-init-fedstorage
Oct 23, 2017
Merged

[stable10] Lazy connect to federated share, not in storage constructor#29314
PVince81 merged 1 commit intostable10from
stable10-lazy-init-fedstorage

Conversation

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #29275 to stable10

Don't connect directly to the remote share inside the storage
constructor. Defer this to the lazy initialization routine, which will
then correctly configure the remote root using the discovery manager.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #29314 into stable10 will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 93.75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             stable10   #29314      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage        58.4%   58.42%   +0.02%     
- Complexity      17695    17701       +6     
==============================================
  Files            1059     1059              
  Lines           59344    59355      +11     
==============================================
+ Hits            34657    34681      +24     
+ Misses          24687    24674      -13
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
lib/private/Files/Storage/DAV.php 11.05% <100%> (+3.29%) 161 <6> (ø) ⬇️
apps/files_sharing/lib/External/Storage.php 28.57% <93.33%> (+5.62%) 49 <6> (+6) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a579d66...3961844. Read the comment docs.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Aug 2, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants