fix(teams): resolve undefined variable error and add logging#6290
fix(teams): resolve undefined variable error and add logging#6290
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6290 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 23.47% 23.47% -0.01%
+ Complexity 454 453 -1
============================================
Files 247 247
Lines 11708 11712 +4
Branches 2223 2222 -1
============================================
Hits 2749 2749
- Misses 8639 8643 +4
Partials 320 320
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
/backport to stable5.0 |
backportbot
bot
added
the
backport-request
|
/backport to stable4.7 |
| */ | ||
| public function getCircleMembers(string $circleId):JSONResponse { | ||
| if (!$this->appManager->isEnabledForUser('circles') || !class_exists('\OCA\Circles\Api\v1\Circles')) { | ||
| if (!class_exists('\OCA\Circles\Api\v1\Circles') || !$this->appManager->isEnabledForUser('circles')) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question, why are we checking if the class exists? Would the check for isEnabledForUser not be sufficient enough to determine if the circles app is installed, enabled on the system and permitted for this user?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original pr mentions a problem with Psalm #5420 (review) ;)
I haven't done any profiling but would expect, especially now with the flipped condition, a little performance gain for systems without circles.
isEnabledForUser does a lot (fetch the installed app versions for all apps, see if the app is installed, fetch the user session, fetch the groups for a user, see if the user has a group that the app is enabled for).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isEnabledForUser does a lot (fetch the installed app versions for all apps, see if the app is installed, fetch the user session, fetch the groups for a user, see if the user has a group that the app is enabled for).
I checked the code... Thats not the case, I think the original author just didn't know there was a build in function to see if the app was enabled, and checked for the existence for the class instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thats not the case
What is not the case?
miaulalala
force-pushed
the
fix/undefined-variable-contracts-controller
branch
from
adef3c9 to
56ca9af
Compare
Signed-off-by: Anna Larch <anna@nextcloud.com>
miaulalala
force-pushed
the
fix/undefined-variable-contracts-controller
branch
from
56ca9af to
9d1688c
Compare
backportbot
bot
removed
the
backport-request
4 participants
Signed-off-by: Anna Larch anna@nextcloud.com