Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 27, 2025

Bumps github/codeql-action from 4.30.9 to 4.31.0.

Release notes

Sourced from github/codeql-action's releases.

v4.31.0

CodeQL Action Changelog

See the releases page for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

4.31.0 - 24 Oct 2025

  • Bump minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.17.6. #3223
  • When SARIF files are uploaded by the analyze or upload-sarif actions, the CodeQL Action automatically performs post-processing steps to prepare the data for the upload. Previously, these post-processing steps were only performed before an upload took place. We are now changing this so that the post-processing steps will always be performed, even when the SARIF files are not uploaded. This does not change anything for the upload-sarif action. For analyze, this may affect Advanced Setup for CodeQL users who specify a value other than always for the upload input. #3222

See the full CHANGELOG.md for more information.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

See the releases page for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

4.31.0 - 24 Oct 2025

  • Bump minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.17.6. #3223
  • When SARIF files are uploaded by the analyze or upload-sarif actions, the CodeQL Action automatically performs post-processing steps to prepare the data for the upload. Previously, these post-processing steps were only performed before an upload took place. We are now changing this so that the post-processing steps will always be performed, even when the SARIF files are not uploaded. This does not change anything for the upload-sarif action. For analyze, this may affect Advanced Setup for CodeQL users who specify a value other than always for the upload input. #3222

4.30.9 - 17 Oct 2025

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.23.3. #3205
  • Experimental: A new setup-codeql action has been added which is similar to init, except it only installs the CodeQL CLI and does not initialize a database. Do not use this in production as it is part of an internal experiment and subject to change at any time. #3204

4.30.8 - 10 Oct 2025

No user facing changes.

4.30.7 - 06 Oct 2025

  • [v4+ only] The CodeQL Action now runs on Node.js v24. #3169

3.30.6 - 02 Oct 2025

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.23.2. #3168

3.30.5 - 26 Sep 2025

  • We fixed a bug that was introduced in 3.30.4 with upload-sarif which resulted in files without a .sarif extension not getting uploaded. #3160

3.30.4 - 25 Sep 2025

  • We have improved the CodeQL Action's ability to validate that the workflow it is used in does not use different versions of the CodeQL Action for different workflow steps. Mixing different versions of the CodeQL Action in the same workflow is unsupported and can lead to unpredictable results. A warning will now be emitted from the codeql-action/init step if different versions of the CodeQL Action are detected in the workflow file. Additionally, an error will now be thrown by the other CodeQL Action steps if they load a configuration file that was generated by a different version of the codeql-action/init step. #3099 and #3100
  • We added support for reducing the size of dependency caches for Java analyses, which will reduce cache usage and speed up workflows. This will be enabled automatically at a later time. #3107
  • You can now run the latest CodeQL nightly bundle by passing tools: nightly to the init action. In general, the nightly bundle is unstable and we only recommend running it when directed by GitHub staff. #3130
  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.23.1. #3118

3.30.3 - 10 Sep 2025

No user facing changes.

3.30.2 - 09 Sep 2025

  • Fixed a bug which could cause language autodetection to fail. #3084
  • Experimental: The quality-queries input that was added in 3.29.2 as part of an internal experiment is now deprecated and will be removed in an upcoming version of the CodeQL Action. It has been superseded by a new analysis-kinds input, which is part of the same internal experiment. Do not use this in production as it is subject to change at any time. #3064

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 4e94bd1 Merge pull request #3235 from github/update-v4.31.0-1d36546c1
  • 8f11182 Update changelog for v4.31.0
  • 1d36546 Merge pull request #3234 from github/mbg/changelog/post-processing
  • 08ada26 Add changelog entry for post-processing change
  • b843cbe Merge pull request #3233 from github/mbg/getOptionalEnvVar
  • 1ecd563 Use getOptionalEnvVar in writePostProcessedFiles
  • e576807 Merge pull request #3223 from github/henrymercer/bump-minimum
  • ad35676 Add getOptionalEnvVar function
  • d75645b Merge pull request #3222 from github/mbg/upload-lib/post-process
  • 710606c Check that outputPath is non-empty
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 4.30.9 to 4.31.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@16140ae...4e94bd1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
  dependency-version: 4.31.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Oct 27, 2025
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from KershawChang as a code owner October 27, 2025 08:22
@dependabot dependabot bot added the github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Oct 27, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.38%. Comparing base (97eab0a) to head (1bf01f3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3079      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.42%   93.38%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       36045    36045              
  Branches    36045    36045              
==========================================
- Hits        33674    33662      -12     
- Misses       1525     1537      +12     
  Partials      846      846              
Components Coverage Δ
neqo-common 97.37% <ø> (ø)
neqo-crypto 83.25% <ø> (-0.48%) ⬇️
neqo-http3 93.34% <ø> (ø)
neqo-qpack 94.18% <ø> (ø)
neqo-transport 94.47% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
neqo-udp 78.94% <ø> (ø)
mtu 85.76% <ø> (ø)

@larseggert larseggert enabled auto-merge October 27, 2025 08:31
@larseggert larseggert added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit bb19094 Oct 27, 2025
51 checks passed
@larseggert larseggert deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-4.31.0 branch October 27, 2025 08:43
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchdependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-4.31.0
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 3 Alerts

BenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/clientLatency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
39.47 ms
(+38.13%)Baseline: 28.57 ms
31.50 ms
(125.30%)

decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3fLatency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
1.78 ms
(+10.03%)Baseline: 1.62 ms
1.76 ms
(101.12%)

decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7fLatency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
5.11 ms
(+0.91%)Baseline: 5.06 ms
5.10 ms
(100.12%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
208,220,000.00 ns
(+0.49%)Baseline: 207,207,095.44 ns
217,916,009.87 ns
(95.55%)
1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
202,820,000.00 ns
(+0.83%)Baseline: 201,142,987.55 ns
212,761,175.02 ns
(95.33%)
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
39,467,000.00 ns
(+38.13%)Baseline: 28,573,161.83 ns
31,498,432.68 ns
(125.30%)

1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
292,710,000.00 ns
(+0.08%)Baseline: 292,461,410.79 ns
305,935,882.34 ns
(95.68%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
119,290,000.00 ns
(+0.66%)Baseline: 118,511,452.28 ns
120,846,538.62 ns
(98.71%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
582,740.00 ns
(-2.11%)Baseline: 595,283.40 ns
619,919.76 ns
(94.00%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14,992,000,000.00 ns
(-0.00%)Baseline: 14,992,630,705.39 ns
15,010,530,506.44 ns
(99.88%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13,573,000.00 ns
(-3.65%)Baseline: 14,087,414.94 ns
14,931,107.51 ns
(90.90%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
19,141,000,000.00 ns
(+1.04%)Baseline: 18,944,792,531.12 ns
19,217,891,024.96 ns
(99.60%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
48,484,000.00 ns
(-5.57%)Baseline: 51,341,991.70 ns
58,026,333.00 ns
(83.56%)
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame()📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
108,200,000.00 ns
(-1.33%)Baseline: 109,660,705.39 ns
111,774,082.24 ns
(96.80%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
88.50 ns
(-0.11%)Baseline: 88.60 ns
89.25 ns
(99.16%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
105.26 ns
(-0.76%)Baseline: 106.07 ns
107.08 ns
(98.30%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
88.96 ns
(-0.93%)Baseline: 89.79 ns
94.08 ns
(94.55%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
105.86 ns
(-0.66%)Baseline: 106.57 ns
107.54 ns
(98.43%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
1,778,900.00 ns
(+10.03%)Baseline: 1,616,683.40 ns
1,759,264.89 ns
(101.12%)

decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
5,109,700.00 ns
(+0.91%)Baseline: 5,063,522.41 ns
5,103,612.32 ns
(100.12%)

decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,021,000.00 ns
(-0.29%)Baseline: 3,029,807.88 ns
3,046,578.43 ns
(99.16%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,552.60 ns
(-29.90%)Baseline: 7,920.45 ns
10,128.71 ns
(54.82%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
19,365.00 ns
(-2.81%)Baseline: 19,924.26 ns
20,416.98 ns
(94.85%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10,632.00 ns
(-8.11%)Baseline: 11,570.78 ns
12,462.51 ns
(85.31%)
sent::Packets::take_ranges📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,652.00 ns
(-1.94%)Baseline: 4,744.16 ns
4,978.17 ns
(93.45%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,710,000,000.00 ns
(+1.33%)Baseline: 25,371,464,435.15 ns
26,009,864,537.13 ns
(98.85%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
26,061,000.00 ns
(+0.50%)Baseline: 25,932,351.46 ns
27,001,344.64 ns
(96.52%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,157,000,000.00 ns
(-0.06%)Baseline: 25,171,083,682.01 ns
25,219,473,403.84 ns
(99.75%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,488,000.00 ns
(-2.14%)Baseline: 26,044,807.53 ns
27,528,756.02 ns
(92.59%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,675,000,000.00 ns
(+0.21%)Baseline: 25,622,217,573.22 ns
25,721,753,072.99 ns
(99.82%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
27,015,000.00 ns
(-0.97%)Baseline: 27,278,506.28 ns
28,679,789.26 ns
(94.20%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,005,000,000.00 ns
(+0.04%)Baseline: 24,994,230,125.52 ns
25,043,374,763.19 ns
(99.85%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
25,800,000.00 ns
(-2.84%)Baseline: 26,554,707.11 ns
28,114,882.79 ns
(91.77%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Client/server transfer results

Performance differences relative to 97eab0a.

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server (params) Mean ± σ Min Max MiB/s ± σ Δ main Δ main
google vs. google 453.2 ± 5.0 447.6 467.9 70.6 ± 6.4
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 275.9 ± 3.8 269.9 284.1 116.0 ± 8.4 💚 -2.1 -0.8%
msquic vs. msquic 160.3 ± 22.9 137.0 251.8 199.6 ± 1.4
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 179.3 ± 20.1 147.4 264.5 178.5 ± 1.6 -5.0 -2.7%
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced) 752.1 ± 3.5 746.3 763.4 42.5 ± 9.1 0.1 0.0%
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced) 159.1 ± 6.1 150.9 184.8 201.1 ± 5.2 💔 1.7 1.1%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic) 94.9 ± 5.1 86.6 109.9 337.2 ± 6.3 0.4 0.4%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 95.6 ± 6.0 87.2 128.1 334.7 ± 5.3 -0.5 -0.5%
neqo vs. neqo (reno) 95.8 ± 5.7 84.5 110.8 334.1 ± 5.6 0.3 0.3%
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced) 94.8 ± 4.7 86.7 109.2 337.5 ± 6.8 💚 -1.6 -1.7%
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced) 196.6 ± 4.3 187.2 205.4 162.8 ± 7.4 💔 1.7 0.9%
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced) 222.0 ± 4.4 214.0 230.4 144.2 ± 7.3 💚 -2.5 -1.1%
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 151.8 ± 6.0 136.6 181.2 210.8 ± 5.3 -0.2 -0.1%
quiche vs. quiche 141.9 ± 4.4 133.7 152.0 225.5 ± 7.3
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 174.9 ± 5.1 166.4 187.6 183.0 ± 6.3 💚 -1.7 -1.0%
s2n vs. s2n 248.2 ± 24.3 232.7 349.0 128.9 ± 1.3

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchdependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-4.31.0
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 3 Alerts

IterationBenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
4neqo vs. neqo (cubic)Latency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
94.90 ms
(+4.93%)Baseline: 90.44 ms
94.32 ms
(100.62%)

5neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced)Latency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
95.62 ms
(+4.15%)Baseline: 91.81 ms
95.45 ms
(100.17%)

6neqo vs. neqo (reno)Latency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
95.77 ms
(+5.90%)Baseline: 90.44 ms
93.93 ms
(101.96%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
275.93 ms
(-0.63%)Baseline: 277.67 ms
280.37 ms
(98.42%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
179.31 ms
(-8.97%)Baseline: 196.97 ms
234.14 ms
(76.58%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
752.09 ms
(-0.71%)Baseline: 757.48 ms
764.46 ms
(98.38%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
159.09 ms
(+0.89%)Baseline: 157.68 ms
160.74 ms
(98.98%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
94.90 ms
(+4.93%)Baseline: 90.44 ms
94.32 ms
(100.62%)

BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
95.62 ms
(+4.15%)Baseline: 91.81 ms
95.45 ms
(100.17%)

BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
95.77 ms
(+5.90%)Baseline: 90.44 ms
93.93 ms
(101.96%)

BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
94.81 ms
(+3.34%)Baseline: 91.74 ms
95.32 ms
(99.46%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
196.60 ms
(+1.49%)Baseline: 193.71 ms
197.12 ms
(99.73%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
221.96 ms
(+0.51%)Baseline: 220.84 ms
223.62 ms
(99.26%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
151.82 ms
(-0.78%)Baseline: 153.01 ms
158.64 ms
(95.70%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
174.85 ms
(+0.39%)Baseline: 174.17 ms
178.30 ms
(98.07%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants