Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

We got rid of latest in #105. Fix the logic to account for that. (Also fix two instanced where we still used latest.)

We got rid of `latest` in #105. Fix the logic to account for that.
(Also fix two instanced where we still used `latest`.)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.72%. Comparing base (a936f8a) to head (9607e51).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #112      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.45%   86.72%   +3.27%     
==========================================
  Files           3        5       +2     
  Lines         284      565     +281     
  Branches      284      565     +281     
==========================================
+ Hits          237      490     +253     
- Misses         38       49      +11     
- Partials        9       26      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@larseggert larseggert merged commit dc9ae59 into main Mar 31, 2025
37 of 38 checks passed
@larseggert larseggert deleted the ci-no-latest branch March 31, 2025 05:26
@mxinden
Copy link
Member

mxinden commented Mar 31, 2025

Uff, my bad. Sorry for the trouble @larseggert!

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No worries.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants