Skip to content

Conversation

@jenshnielsen
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@jenshnielsen jenshnielsen requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 09:52
@jenshnielsen jenshnielsen changed the title Assign sr85x submodules to static attributes Assign sr86x submodules to static attributes Oct 1, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.80%. Comparing base (8f15c30) to head (a5f27ef).
⚠️ Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...odes/instrument_drivers/stanford_research/SR86x.py 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7542      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.82%   59.80%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         351      351              
  Lines       31649    31657       +8     
==========================================
  Hits        18933    18933              
- Misses      12716    12724       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@astafan8 astafan8 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 3f73b22 Oct 7, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
@jenshnielsen jenshnielsen deleted the sr86x branch October 13, 2025 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants