Skip to content

Conversation

@thomasjm
Copy link
Contributor

As requested on #532

Copy link
Contributor

@3noch 3noch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @kmicklas - in case you can see effects of this change that I cannot.

@kmicklas kmicklas added the breaking change Change will require a major version bump label Jan 10, 2021
@kmicklas kmicklas added this to the 0.10.0.0 milestone Aug 7, 2021
@thomasjm thomasjm force-pushed the generic-serial branch 2 times, most recently from 58d3486 to 3e2da4e Compare June 19, 2025 13:22
@thomasjm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @LaurentRDC, I was hoping you could take a look at this as well.

This was an old PR, where I've just responded to all of @kmicklas's comments.

@LaurentRDC
Copy link
Member

LaurentRDC commented Jun 19, 2025

Thanks, I got all the notifications ;)

This is a breaking change, and we've been accumulating them for an impending 0.11 release. I'll need to check with Travis because there were other PRs he wanted to get in.

I'll update this PR to point to the 0.11 branch. You'll need to rebase

@LaurentRDC LaurentRDC changed the base branch from master to beam-0.11 June 19, 2025 13:30
@thomasjm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebase done!

@LaurentRDC
Copy link
Member

Thanks! I just rebased beam-0.11 onto master`, and it looks like there's no conflict. I should be able to review one more time and merge soon

@LaurentRDC LaurentRDC merged commit e270aac into haskell-beam:beam-0.11 Jun 19, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking change Change will require a major version bump

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants