Skip to content

Conversation

@jpoehnelt
Copy link
Contributor

closes #268

This causes issues regarding what is the source of truth. I would prefer to default to the API to handle this which returns the follow error to the user.

ApiError: INVALID_REQUEST (Error while parsing 'fields' parameter: Unsupported field name 'foo'. )

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #302 into master will increase coverage by 1.35%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #302      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.22%   89.57%   +1.35%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         620      614       -6     
==========================================
+ Hits          547      550       +3     
+ Misses         73       64       -9
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
googlemaps/places.py 95.28% <ø> (-0.26%) ⬇️
googlemaps/convert.py 97.39% <0%> (+0.86%) ⬆️
googlemaps/client.py 95.67% <0%> (+4.32%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5439986...d807276. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #302 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #302   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.67%   89.67%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         620      620           
=======================================
  Hits          556      556           
  Misses         64       64
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
googlemaps/places.py 95.53% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3afe658...1044844. Read the comment docs.

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt requested a review from amuramoto August 26, 2019 22:00
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt force-pushed the fix/subfields_support branch from d807276 to 1044844 Compare September 6, 2019 21:50
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 6, 2019
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt changed the title remove client side validation of fields param add support for subfields in field masks Sep 6, 2019
@jpoehnelt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@amuramoto sorry for all the formatting in the diff. only changes were the list of values and the tests with a subfield

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt added triage me I really want to be triaged. and removed triage me I really want to be triaged. labels Sep 9, 2019
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt merged commit b70730a into master Sep 9, 2019
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt deleted the fix/subfields_support branch September 9, 2019 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sub fields not supported by place

2 participants