Skip to content

Verification on Training Details #8

@lthilnklover

Description

@lthilnklover

Hi,

I am trying to reproduce the CIFAR-10 experiment with wide resnet. However I was only able to achieve 2.96% Test Error with SAM and 3.5% Test Error with SGD. Since I am using only 4 GPUs for training, I understand that the performance of SAM could be different. However in case of SGD, if all hyperparameters are same, I believe the performance should be similar.

I tried my best to replicate the hyperparameters mentioned in the paper. However some parameters were not so clearly stated. So it would be grateful, if you could verify my training details. Here is the hyperparameters I used for training:

learning rate : 0.1
epoch : 200 (and 400 in case of SGD)
batch size : 256
scheduler : cosine
weight decay : 0.0005
rho : 0.05
beta : 0.9
Nesterov : True

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions