Skip to content

Conversation

@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor

Ticket []

Description Of Changes

Code Changes

Steps to Confirm

Pre-Merge Checklist

  • Issue requirements met
  • All CI pipelines succeeded
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
    • Add a db-migration This indicates that a change includes a database migration label to the entry if your change includes a DB migration
    • Add a high-risk This issue suggests changes that have a high-probability of breaking existing code label to the entry if your change includes a high-risk change (i.e. potential for performance impact or unexpected regression) that should be flagged
    • Updates unreleased work already in Changelog, no new entry necessary
  • UX feedback:
    • All UX related changes have been reviewed by a designer
    • No UX review needed
  • Followup issues:
    • Followup issues created
    • No followup issues
  • Database migrations:
    • Ensure that your downrev is up to date with the latest revision on main
    • Ensure that your downgrade() migration is correct and works
      • If a downgrade migration is not possible for this change, please call this out in the PR description!
    • No migrations
  • Documentation:
    • Documentation complete, PR opened in fidesdocs
    • Documentation issue created in fidesdocs
    • If there are any new client scopes created as part of the pull request, remember to update public-facing documentation that references our scope registry
    • No documentation updates required

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 31, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fides-plus-nightly Ignored Ignored Oct 31, 2025 7:34pm
fides-privacy-center Ignored Ignored Oct 31, 2025 7:34pm

Copy link
Contributor Author

@adamsachs adamsachs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some notes on an initial commit here...

Comment on lines -401 to -403
existing_translation: Optional[ExperienceTranslation] = (
self.get_translation_by_language(db, translation_data.get("language"))
)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formatting fixes by our commit hook, sorry for the noise

Comment on lines -699 to -706
removed_regions: List[PrivacyNoticeRegion] = (
[ # Regions that were not in the request, but currently attached to the Config
PrivacyNoticeRegion(reg)
for reg in {reg.value for reg in current_regions}.difference(
{reg.value for reg in regions}
)
]
)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formatting, sorry for the noise

Comment on lines -833 to -835
experience_translations: List[ExperienceTranslation] = (
privacy_experience_config.translations
)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formatting...

Comment on lines -519 to -521
self.affected_system_status[system] = (
status.name
) # To avoid using "ExecutionLogStatus.paused" in the logs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formatting...

banner_and_modal = "banner_and_modal"
api = "api"
tcf_overlay = "tcf_overlay"
headless = "headless"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the actual change!

Comment on lines +31 to +33
NOTE: updates here should be made accordingly to the privacy_preference.RequestOrigin enum,
as the values here can be saved in the privacy_preference.request_origin column.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in lieu of a more formal/proper way to couple these, just throwing a warning note here as a first line of defense against this happening again...

we could probably write a little test that compares them? :)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.47%. Comparing base (3a382cb) to head (b2ec09a).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6901   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.47%   87.47%           
=======================================
  Files         523      523           
  Lines       34090    34091    +1     
  Branches     3917     3917           
=======================================
+ Hits        29820    29821    +1     
  Misses       3414     3414           
  Partials      856      856           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@adamsachs
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing as we're doing #6902 instead

@adamsachs adamsachs closed this Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants