Skip to content

add preview suffix in experimental CI Builds, enable expinsert#11534

Merged
YuliiaKovalova merged 6 commits intodotnet:vs17.8from
JanProvaznik:exp/vs17.8-exppipelines
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

add preview suffix in experimental CI Builds, enable expinsert#11534
YuliiaKovalova merged 6 commits intodotnet:vs17.8from
JanProvaznik:exp/vs17.8-exppipelines

Conversation

@JanProvaznik
Copy link
Member

@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik commented Mar 4, 2025

Fixes #11492

Context

we added packages to feeds when developing whose version matched the ones we wanted to release, which lead to conflicts

Changes Made

  1. for experimental builds on release branches removes the branding so that the produced packages have -preview suffix which prevents conflicts in feeds
  2. ported experimental insertion pipeline to release branches
  3. add a step that in exp insertion selects a servicing target branch based on the branch prefix exp/vsXX.Y(Y)...

Testing

MSBuild pipeline run: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_build/results?buildId=11123072&view=results
Exp Insertion: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/_build/results?buildId=11123201&view=results

Notes

  • should merge flow to active vs17.* release branches

@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik requested a review from a team March 4, 2025 12:47
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik changed the title remove release branding for experimental in CI Build remove release branding for experimental CI Builds Mar 4, 2025
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik changed the title remove release branding for experimental CI Builds add preview prefix in experimental CI Builds Mar 4, 2025
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik changed the title add preview prefix in experimental CI Builds add preview prefix in experimental CI Builds, enable expinsert Mar 4, 2025
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik changed the title add preview prefix in experimental CI Builds, enable expinsert add preview suffix in experimental CI Builds, enable expinsert Mar 4, 2025
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik linked an issue Mar 5, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik requested a review from a team March 10, 2025 08:44
Copy link
Member

@YuliiaKovalova YuliiaKovalova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@YuliiaKovalova
Copy link
Member

@rainersigwald a friendly reminder

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

experimental insertion should not push non-preview packages

3 participants