-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 812
OpenID: Add claims to Well know #967
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Some client can't use userinfo, and get propelty from claims. Add claims key inside wellknow.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #967 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.59% 96.62% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 31 31
Lines 1732 1746 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 1673 1687 +14
Misses 59 59
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this will also need a changelog entry and openid spec reference to understand the reasoning behind this change. can you do so pleas?
our custom validator:: | ||
|
||
our custom validator. | ||
Standard claim ``sub`` is included by default, for remove it override ``get_claim_list``:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to remove it..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is StandardClaims, some application use it for discover available params.
My case application is https://docebo.com
As commented inside code:
https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#StandardClaims
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The remark was about the preposition.
@AndreaGreco I've been forced to revert this PR because you changed the signature of Please review and resubmit a PR that doesn't change the signature and I'll be happy to review it. Thanks. |
Also, please consider my comment: #1068 (comment) |
Description of the Change
Some application, don't use user_info, and read directly by wellknow
Add to wellknow related key and changed class for support list and custom claims
Checklist
CHANGELOG.md
updated (only for user relevant changes)AUTHORS