Fix an issue with hidden investigators #1573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Chr1Z93
requested review from
BootleggerFinn,
Entrox-Licher,
Tikatoy,
argonui and
dscarpac
as code owners
dscarpac
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When arkham.build writes a deck to ArkhamDB and that deck does not have the investigator / card yet, it uses the "hidden_slots" field to hide that data since ArkhamDB would delete it.
We had a small typo in the investigator_code replacement logic, which surfaced now due to Isabelle not being on ArkhamDB.