Skip to content

Conversation

@luNunezProcessmaker
Copy link
Contributor

@luNunezProcessmaker luNunezProcessmaker commented Oct 1, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Made the change to call the new API /requests-by-case?case_number=
At the same time, work was done on adapting some columns to correctly receive the data from the API and changing the table to perform the sort

FOUR-18139: Enable the order desc/asc "Requests" tab

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy
ci:next

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Oct 1, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-3742593f62.engk8s.processmaker.net

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Oct 2, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-3742593f62.engk8s.processmaker.net

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Oct 2, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-3742593f62.engk8s.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title Feature/four 19330 feature/FOUR-19330 Oct 2, 2024
@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit 1c317d1 into feature/FOUR-18130 Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants