Skip to content

Conversation

@fagubla
Copy link
Contributor

@fagubla fagubla commented Sep 17, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Story 5

Solution

  • List the changes you've introduced to solve the issue.

How to Test

Describe how to test that this solution works.

Related Tickets & Packages

  • Link to any related FOUR tickets, PRDs, or packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next

@fagubla fagubla requested a review from pmPaulis September 19, 2024 15:36
@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit 88dea32 into feature/FOUR-18130 Sep 19, 2024
@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title Feature/four 18135 feature/FOUR-18135: Story 5 Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants