Skip to content

Conversation

@MaxBlesch
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 64.28571% with 95 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.06%. Comparing base (346cfa4) to head (3fbfd68).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/dcegm/interfaces/model_class.py 35.00% 39 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/interfaces/sol_interface.py 45.23% 23 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/interfaces/interface_checks.py 61.22% 19 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/solve_single_period.py 52.94% 8 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/final_periods.py 66.66% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/interpolation/interp_interfaces.py 92.59% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/dcegm/interfaces/index_functions.py 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (64.28%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #179      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.90%   91.06%   -3.84%     
==========================================
  Files          63       66       +3     
  Lines        1826     2004     +178     
==========================================
+ Hits         1733     1825      +92     
- Misses         93      179      +86     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MaxBlesch MaxBlesch force-pushed the more_debug_options branch from 0a574ca to f70987a Compare July 8, 2025 12:02
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants