Skip to content

Conversation

@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor

@zimeon zimeon commented Mar 27, 2020

Fixes #430

Copy link
Contributor

@rosy1280 rosy1280 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor editorial changes requested

Copy link
Member

@neilsjefferies neilsjefferies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better for the example if the SHA512 digests were more clearly distinct from the SHA256's to make it clear what has changed where in the inventory. And/or highlight them.

@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

zimeon commented Mar 28, 2020

@neilsjefferies you have spotted a real error in that my example the truncated sha256 were actually just differently truncated sha512... I'll fix that. Perhaps also it would help to make the truncated sha512 obviously twice as long as the truncated sha256

ahankinson
ahankinson previously approved these changes Mar 29, 2020
neilsjefferies
neilsjefferies previously approved these changes Mar 30, 2020
@rosy1280 rosy1280 self-requested a review March 30, 2020 12:39
rosy1280
rosy1280 previously approved these changes Mar 30, 2020
@awoods
Copy link
Member

awoods commented Mar 30, 2020

I have not yet given this a full review... but there seems to be a lot of whitespace/reformatting updates that are otherwise unrelated to this PR. Can those be removed?

@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

zimeon commented Mar 30, 2020

@awoods - not without a bunch of work

@ahankinson
Copy link
Contributor

As the changes are non-content, I'd be OK with just leaving them; they're easy to ignore.

Co-authored-by: Andrew Woods <awoods@duraspace.org>
@zimeon zimeon dismissed stale reviews from rosy1280, neilsjefferies, and ahankinson via 192247c March 30, 2020 14:46
@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

zimeon commented Mar 30, 2020

I merged in @awoods removal of formatting fixes (I guess we should have a separate PR for those too). Needs re-review

awoods
awoods previously approved these changes Mar 30, 2020
@awoods
Copy link
Member

awoods commented Mar 30, 2020

I merged in @awoods removal of formatting fixes (I guess we should have a separate PR for those too). Needs re-review

+1 to having a separate, non-functional, whitespace-cleanup PR.

rosy1280
rosy1280 previously approved these changes Mar 30, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@julianmorley julianmorley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming I'm reading the spec right, although address 'should' be in URI format, may as well go for gold and set a good example.

@zimeon zimeon dismissed stale reviews from rosy1280 and awoods via 9d5adbb March 30, 2020 16:33
@julianmorley julianmorley merged commit 5fc1645 into master Mar 31, 2020
@julianmorley julianmorley deleted the issue-430 branch March 31, 2020 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add description of changing digestAlgorithm to implementation notes

7 participants