Skip to content

Conversation

@Dustin4444
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-13052974
  696  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-RACK-13052974
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-989497472bd211fa0e70603ef02e22bd

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dustin4444, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance the project's security by automatically updating several Ruby gem dependencies to patch a high-severity vulnerability related to resource allocation. The core purpose is to mitigate a known security risk by upgrading affected packages. It's crucial to note that the Gemfile.lock requires manual update to fully apply the dependency changes.

Highlights

  • Vulnerability Fix: This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses one high-severity vulnerability: "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling" (SNYK-RUBY-RACK-13052974).
  • Gem Dependencies Updated: Several Ruby gem dependencies have been updated in the Gemfile to resolve the identified vulnerability. These include actionpack, railties, lograge, turbo-rails, dotenv-rails, rspec-rails, and capybara.
  • Gemfile.lock Warning: Snyk reported a failure to automatically update the Gemfile.lock file, indicating that it will require manual updating before this pull request can be merged.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, updates several gem dependencies in the Gemfile to resolve a security vulnerability. The dependency updates themselves look correct for addressing the issue.

My main feedback is regarding the version constraints. For several updated gems, the constraint has been set to >= version, which is quite permissive and could lead to unexpected breaking changes in the future if a new major version is released. I've left specific comments suggesting the use of pessimistic version constraints (~>) for lograge, turbo-rails, dotenv-rails, rspec-rails, and capybara to improve the long-term stability and predictability of your dependencies.

Most importantly, as noted in the pull request description, the Gemfile.lock has not been updated. You will need to run bundle install or bundle update locally to apply these changes, generate the new Gemfile.lock, and commit it before merging this pull request.


# One rails log line per request, instead of enraging quantity
gem "lograge"
gem "lograge", ">= 0.13.0"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's safer to use a pessimistic version constraint (~>) to prevent your application from automatically updating to a new major version of lograge that might include breaking changes. This will lock the gem to the 0.13.x series.

gem "lograge", "~> 0.13.0"


# No page reloads
gem 'turbo-rails'
gem 'turbo-rails', '>= 2.0.12'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better dependency management and to avoid accidentally pulling in future breaking changes, it's recommended to use a pessimistic version constraint. This will ensure you get bug fixes and new features within the 2.0.x series without automatically upgrading to a 2.1 or 3.0 release which might contain breaking changes.

gem 'turbo-rails', '~> 2.0.12'

# Call "byebug" anywhere in the code to stop execution and get a debugger console
gem "byebug", platforms: [:mri, :mingw, :x64_mingw]
gem "dotenv-rails"
gem "dotenv-rails", ">= 3.0.0"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using a pessimistic version constraint (~>) is safer for long-term maintenance. It prevents your application from automatically adopting future major versions (like 4.0.0) which could introduce breaking changes. This change locks the dependency to the 3.x series.

  gem "dotenv-rails", "~> 3.0.0"

group :test do
# Who doesn't love tests!?
gem "rspec-rails"
gem "rspec-rails", ">= 8.0.0"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To prevent unexpected breaking changes from future major versions, it's a good practice to use a pessimistic version constraint. This will lock rspec-rails to the 8.x series.

  gem "rspec-rails", "~> 8.0.0"


# Browser testing stuff
gem "capybara"
gem "capybara", ">= 3.36.0"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using a pessimistic version constraint (~>) is recommended to avoid pulling in future versions with potential breaking changes. This will restrict updates to the 3.36.x series.

  gem "capybara", "~> 3.36.0"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants