Conversation
minor lint fixes
Member
|
@Noiredd for testing you could consider the Of course your test handles everything just fine by handling the clipping boundaries itself. I thought I would mention the kink setting of the gradient checker in case it is useful elsewhere since it is not often invoked. |
Member
Author
|
Oooh, so this is what |
XinYao1994
pushed a commit
to XinYao1994/caffe
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2018
Clip layer - resurrection
beniz
pushed a commit
to jolibrain/caffe
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2018
Clip layer - resurrection
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#3791 introduced a clip layer to constrain activations to some predefined range of values. It had some problems with unit tests however:
This is a resubmission of that PR, with modified gradient tests: values that fall within the discontinuity regions are excluded from the blob before the
GradientCheckerruns.Closes #3791