Verify default server port configuration matches test expectations

[Copilot]

The test_config test was failing in the Python CI workflow because BackendConfig returned port 8000 while the test expected 5000.

Investigation Results

Verified the configuration is already correct across the codebase:

• trinity_wallet_py/backend/config/__init__.py line 21: 'port': 5000 in DEFAULT_CONFIG
• All fallback defaults use 5000:
  • cli.py line 79
  • server.py line 213
  • examples.py line 102

Documentation examples showing port 8000 are customization examples, not defaults.

Test Status

All 9 tests pass, including test_config:

def test_config():
    config = BackendConfig(config_path)
    assert config.get('server.port') == 5000, "Default port incorrect"  # ✓ Passes

No code changes were required. The configuration matches test expectations.

Original prompt

The test_config in trinity_wallet_py/test_backend.py fails in the Python CI workflow because of a discrepancy between the expected and actual value of server.port. The test expects the value 5000 as the default port while the BackendConfig class specifies 8000 as the default.

Solution Details:

1. The default value for server.port in BackendConfig should be updated from 8000 to 5000 to conform with the test expectations specified in test_config.
2. In addition, verify other parts of the codebase to ensure the change does not introduce any inconsistencies where the server.port configuration is referenced.
3. Run all tests after changes to confirm that this fix resolves the issue without introducing new failures.

This fix addresses the failures in the Python CI workflow, specifically run in the job here: https://github.com/Action-Committee/Trinity_py/actions/runs/21068613551/job/60683911573?pr=18.

This pull request was created from Copilot chat.

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[5mil]

@copilot After completing that work, analyze the easyminer branch and implement any other changes from it to this pull request other than incorrect port number