Teams building AI products need to understand how well their product is working: Where are the gaps between AI-generated lessons and national learning standards? Is the AI capturing the necessary patient history in clinical notes? Are AI-generated risk assessments accounting for the right market factors?
But evaluating AI is genuinely difficult. Unlike traditional software, you can't just write unit tests and call it done. You need experimentation, careful methodology, and judgment from people who actually understand what "good" looks like in your AI product's domain.
That domain expert is often outside the evaluation process entirely. They give feedback to engineers who try to translate it into automated evaluations. It falls short. The cycle repeats. Weeks pass. Nuance gets lost.
The result is millions in costs, missed deadlines, and unreliable AI products.
We built Goodeye Labs so you can evaluate AI without PhD-level expertise or expensive consultants.