|
| 1 | +# |
| 2 | +# Bug#119442: Optimizer doesn't simplify ORDER BY when field IS NULL |
| 3 | +# |
| 4 | +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1; |
| 5 | +CREATE TABLE t1 ( |
| 6 | +id INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, |
| 7 | +category_id INT NOT NULL, |
| 8 | +nullable_date DATETIME DEFAULT NULL, |
| 9 | +created_by VARCHAR(50), |
| 10 | +status VARCHAR(20), |
| 11 | +priority TINYINT, |
| 12 | +item_name VARCHAR(100), |
| 13 | +description VARCHAR(200), |
| 14 | +KEY idx_covering (category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name, description) |
| 15 | +) ENGINE=InnoDB; |
| 16 | +INSERT INTO t1 (category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name, description) VALUES |
| 17 | +(100, NULL, 'User1', 'Active', 0, 'Item A', 'Description 1'), |
| 18 | +(100, NULL, 'User1', 'Active', 0, 'Item B', 'Description 2'), |
| 19 | +(100, NULL, 'User1', 'Active', 0, 'Item C', 'Description 3'), |
| 20 | +(100, NULL, 'User1', 'Pending', 0, 'Item D', 'Description 4'), |
| 21 | +(100, '2024-01-01 10:00:00', 'User1', 'Active', 0, 'Item E', 'Description 5'), |
| 22 | +(200, NULL, 'User2', 'Active', 1, 'Item F', 'Description 6'), |
| 23 | +(200, NULL, 'User3', 'Pending', 0, 'Item G', 'Description 7'); |
| 24 | +ANALYZE TABLE t1; |
| 25 | +Table Op Msg_type Msg_text |
| 26 | +test.t1 analyze status OK |
| 27 | +# |
| 28 | +# Test 1: Basic IS NULL with ORDER BY - demonstrating covering index lookup |
| 29 | +# Covering index is used for IS NULL lookup (category_id, nullable_date) |
| 30 | +# but filesort still needed for item_name since intermediate fields aren't constant |
| 31 | +# |
| 32 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 33 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 34 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 35 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND nullable_date IS NULL |
| 36 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, item_name; |
| 37 | +EXPLAIN |
| 38 | +-> Sort: t1.item_name (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 39 | + -> Filter: (t1.nullable_date is null) (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 40 | + -> Covering index lookup on t1 using idx_covering (category_id = 100, nullable_date = NULL) (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +# |
| 43 | +# Test 2: Compound index with IS NULL - demonstrating NO filesort |
| 44 | +# Unlike Test 1, all intermediate index fields are constant, allowing |
| 45 | +# the index to provide ordering for item_name without filesort |
| 46 | +# |
| 47 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 48 | +SELECT id, category_id, status, priority, item_name, description |
| 49 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 50 | +WHERE category_id = 100 |
| 51 | +AND nullable_date IS NULL |
| 52 | +AND created_by = 'User1' |
| 53 | + AND status = 'Active' |
| 54 | + AND priority = 0 |
| 55 | +AND item_name >= 'Item B' |
| 56 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name ASC |
| 57 | +LIMIT 10; |
| 58 | +EXPLAIN |
| 59 | +-> Limit: 10 row(s) (cost=0.702 rows=2) |
| 60 | + -> Filter: ((t1.priority = 0) and (t1.`status` = 'Active') and (t1.created_by = 'User1') and (t1.category_id = 100) and (t1.nullable_date is null) and (t1.item_name >= 'Item B')) (cost=0.702 rows=2) |
| 61 | + -> Covering index range scan on t1 using idx_covering over (category_id = 100 AND nullable_date = NULL AND created_by = 'User1' AND status = 'Active' AND priority = 0 AND 'Item B' <= item_name) (cost=0.702 rows=2) |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +SELECT id, category_id, status, priority, item_name |
| 64 | +FROM t1 |
| 65 | +WHERE category_id = 100 |
| 66 | +AND nullable_date IS NULL |
| 67 | +AND created_by = 'User1' |
| 68 | + AND status = 'Active' |
| 69 | + AND priority = 0 |
| 70 | +AND item_name >= 'Item B' |
| 71 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name ASC |
| 72 | +LIMIT 10; |
| 73 | +id category_id status priority item_name |
| 74 | +2 100 Active 0 Item B |
| 75 | +3 100 Active 0 Item C |
| 76 | +# |
| 77 | +# Test 3: Mix of equality and IS NULL with all intermediate fields constant |
| 78 | +# All intermediate index fields are constant, so index can provide ordering |
| 79 | +# for item_name without filesort (demonstrates IS NULL works like equality) |
| 80 | +# |
| 81 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 82 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name |
| 83 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 84 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND nullable_date IS NULL AND created_by = 'User1' AND status = 'Active' AND priority = 0 |
| 85 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name; |
| 86 | +EXPLAIN |
| 87 | +-> Filter: (t1.nullable_date is null) (cost=0.35 rows=1) |
| 88 | + -> Covering index lookup on t1 using idx_covering (category_id = 100, nullable_date = NULL, created_by = 'User1', status = 'Active', priority = 0) (cost=0.35 rows=1) |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +# |
| 91 | +# Test 4: IS NOT NULL should NOT be treated as constant |
| 92 | +# This is a negative test - field can have many different non-NULL values |
| 93 | +# |
| 94 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 95 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 96 | +FROM t1 |
| 97 | +WHERE nullable_date IS NOT NULL |
| 98 | +ORDER BY nullable_date, item_name; |
| 99 | +EXPLAIN |
| 100 | +-> Sort: t1.nullable_date, t1.item_name (cost=0.95 rows=7) |
| 101 | + -> Filter: (t1.nullable_date is not null) (cost=0.95 rows=7) |
| 102 | + -> Covering index scan on t1 using idx_covering (cost=0.95 rows=7) |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +# |
| 105 | +# Test 5: Test with optimizer trace to verify "equals_constant_in_where" |
| 106 | +# The trace should show that nullable_date is recognized as constant |
| 107 | +# |
| 108 | +SET optimizer_trace="enabled=on"; |
| 109 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 110 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 111 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND nullable_date IS NULL |
| 112 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 113 | +LIMIT 2; |
| 114 | +id category_id nullable_date item_name |
| 115 | +1 100 NULL Item A |
| 116 | +2 100 NULL Item B |
| 117 | +SELECT IF( |
| 118 | +LOCATE('"equals_constant_in_where": true', TRACE) > 0, |
| 119 | +'PASS: nullable_date recognized as constant', |
| 120 | +'FAIL: nullable_date not recognized as constant' |
| 121 | +) AS trace_check |
| 122 | +FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.OPTIMIZER_TRACE; |
| 123 | +trace_check |
| 124 | +PASS: nullable_date recognized as constant |
| 125 | +SET optimizer_trace="enabled=off"; |
| 126 | +# |
| 127 | +# Test 6: OR with IS NULL - field should NOT be treated as constant |
| 128 | +# (nullable_date can be NULL OR have a value, so it's not constant) |
| 129 | +# |
| 130 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 131 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 132 | +FROM t1 |
| 133 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND (nullable_date IS NULL OR nullable_date > '2024-01-01') |
| 134 | +ORDER BY nullable_date, item_name; |
| 135 | +EXPLAIN |
| 136 | +-> Sort: t1.nullable_date, t1.item_name (cost=1.43 rows=5) |
| 137 | + -> Filter: ((t1.category_id = 100) and ((t1.nullable_date is null) or (t1.nullable_date > TIMESTAMP'2024-01-01 00:00:00'))) (cost=1.43 rows=5) |
| 138 | + -> Covering index range scan on t1 using idx_covering over (category_id = 100 AND nullable_date = NULL) OR (category_id = 100 AND '2024-01-01 00:00:00' < nullable_date) (cost=1.43 rows=5) |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 141 | +FROM t1 |
| 142 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND (nullable_date IS NULL OR nullable_date > '2024-01-01') |
| 143 | +ORDER BY nullable_date, item_name; |
| 144 | +id category_id nullable_date item_name |
| 145 | +1 100 NULL Item A |
| 146 | +2 100 NULL Item B |
| 147 | +3 100 NULL Item C |
| 148 | +4 100 NULL Item D |
| 149 | +5 100 2024-01-01 10:00:00 Item E |
| 150 | +# |
| 151 | +# Test 7: OR with multiple IS NULL - same field |
| 152 | +# This is effectively the same as a single IS NULL, so field IS constant |
| 153 | +# |
| 154 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 155 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, item_name |
| 156 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 157 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND (nullable_date IS NULL OR nullable_date IS NULL) |
| 158 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, item_name; |
| 159 | +EXPLAIN |
| 160 | +-> Sort: t1.item_name (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 161 | + -> Filter: ((t1.nullable_date is null) or (t1.nullable_date is null)) (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 162 | + -> Covering index lookup on t1 using idx_covering (category_id = 100, nullable_date = NULL) (cost=0.775 rows=4) |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +# |
| 165 | +# Test 8: Verify IS NULL works with DESC ordering |
| 166 | +# When nullable_date IS NULL with other constants, index can still be used |
| 167 | +# even with DESC on the non-constant field |
| 168 | +# |
| 169 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 170 | +SELECT id, category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name |
| 171 | +FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(idx_covering) |
| 172 | +WHERE category_id = 100 AND nullable_date IS NULL AND created_by = 'User1' AND status = 'Active' AND priority = 0 |
| 173 | +ORDER BY category_id, nullable_date, created_by, status, priority, item_name DESC; |
| 174 | +EXPLAIN |
| 175 | +-> Filter: (t1.nullable_date is null) (cost=0.633 rows=3) |
| 176 | + -> Covering index lookup on t1 using idx_covering (category_id = 100, nullable_date = NULL, created_by = 'User1', status = 'Active', priority = 0) (reverse) (cost=0.633 rows=3) |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +# |
| 179 | +# Test 9: Verify NULL ordering semantics with ASC |
| 180 | +# NULLs should appear FIRST with ORDER BY ASC |
| 181 | +# |
| 182 | +CREATE TABLE t_null_order ( |
| 183 | +id INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, |
| 184 | +val INT, |
| 185 | +name VARCHAR(10), |
| 186 | +KEY idx_val (val, name) |
| 187 | +); |
| 188 | +INSERT INTO t_null_order (val, name) VALUES |
| 189 | +(NULL, 'null1'), |
| 190 | +(NULL, 'null2'), |
| 191 | +(5, 'five'), |
| 192 | +(10, 'ten'), |
| 193 | +(NULL, 'null3'), |
| 194 | +(1, 'one'); |
| 195 | +ANALYZE TABLE t_null_order; |
| 196 | +Table Op Msg_type Msg_text |
| 197 | +test.t_null_order analyze status OK |
| 198 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order ORDER BY val ASC, name ASC; |
| 199 | +id val name |
| 200 | +1 NULL null1 |
| 201 | +2 NULL null2 |
| 202 | +5 NULL null3 |
| 203 | +6 1 one |
| 204 | +3 5 five |
| 205 | +4 10 ten |
| 206 | +# |
| 207 | +# Test 10: Verify NULL ordering semantics with DESC |
| 208 | +# NULLs should appear LAST with ORDER BY DESC |
| 209 | +# |
| 210 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order ORDER BY val DESC, name ASC; |
| 211 | +id val name |
| 212 | +4 10 ten |
| 213 | +3 5 five |
| 214 | +6 1 one |
| 215 | +1 NULL null1 |
| 216 | +2 NULL null2 |
| 217 | +5 NULL null3 |
| 218 | +# |
| 219 | +# Test 11: Verify optimization works with DESC and preserves NULL ordering |
| 220 | +# With val IS NULL, val is constant, so should only sort by name |
| 221 | +# |
| 222 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 223 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order FORCE INDEX(idx_val) |
| 224 | +WHERE val IS NULL |
| 225 | +ORDER BY val DESC, name ASC; |
| 226 | +EXPLAIN |
| 227 | +-> Filter: (t_null_order.val is null) (cost=0.553 rows=3) |
| 228 | + -> Covering index lookup on t_null_order using idx_val (val = NULL) (cost=0.553 rows=3) |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order FORCE INDEX(idx_val) |
| 231 | +WHERE val IS NULL |
| 232 | +ORDER BY val DESC, name ASC; |
| 233 | +id val name |
| 234 | +1 NULL null1 |
| 235 | +2 NULL null2 |
| 236 | +5 NULL null3 |
| 237 | +# |
| 238 | +# Test 12: Mixed ASC/DESC with IS NULL constraint |
| 239 | +# |
| 240 | +EXPLAIN FORMAT=TREE |
| 241 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order FORCE INDEX(idx_val) |
| 242 | +WHERE val IS NULL |
| 243 | +ORDER BY val ASC, name DESC; |
| 244 | +EXPLAIN |
| 245 | +-> Filter: (t_null_order.val is null) (cost=0.553 rows=3) |
| 246 | + -> Covering index lookup on t_null_order using idx_val (val = NULL) (reverse) (cost=0.553 rows=3) |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | +SELECT id, val, name FROM t_null_order FORCE INDEX(idx_val) |
| 249 | +WHERE val IS NULL |
| 250 | +ORDER BY val ASC, name DESC; |
| 251 | +id val name |
| 252 | +5 NULL null3 |
| 253 | +2 NULL null2 |
| 254 | +1 NULL null1 |
| 255 | +DROP TABLE t_null_order; |
| 256 | +DROP TABLE t1; |
| 257 | +# |
| 258 | +# End of test for Bug#119442 |
| 259 | +# |
0 commit comments