For the Python implementation, should qradd and lsqr be re-implemented or are there better Python equivalents? #35
Unanswered
nbelakovski
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi @nbelakovski ! I do not think there is an equivalent of As for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm working through implementing trstlp and trstlp_sub, and I see that they use a QR factorization which gets updated on every loop and also used to solve a least squares problem. I also noticed the note in linalg.f90 about using native/library implementations for the functions within that module, but I don't see a routine in numpy that would compute least squares using a user-provided Q and R (or R diagonal for that matter) matrices.
The question I'm trying to ask ultimately boils down to this:
Is there a way I can implement trstlp_sub in Python by making use of existing libraries? This comes with the understanding that if we want to use a custom implementation later, we can always do that, but that using existing libraries may speed up the process of getting a first cut at the Python implementation.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions