Updates to c5

[Robinlovelace]

No description provided.

[Robinlovelace]

Heads-up @Nowosad this is good to go. Looking at it, it's a long chapter. I think that splitting out the raster-vector interactions content into a new dedicated chapter could represent a quick win, it's a long chapter and the topic is so important as to merit it's own chapter IMO atm.

[Nowosad]

@Robinlovelace Yes -- I think that is a good idea. What do you think @jannes-m ?

[Robinlovelace]

Good stuff, I've created a new issue #706 on the topic. Will merge this now to keep things moving.

[jannes-m]

Aside from reducing the length of chapter 5, it would be sensible to split out the raster-vector stuff into a new chapter simply because extracting values from a raster is not changing the geometry of an spatial object (and therefore strictly speaking it does not belong to c5) and because raster-vector operations are somehow special in any case.

[Robinlovelace]

Thanks for the comment Jannes, sounds like there's consensus!