[DOC] Fix documentation for Numeric#eql?

peterzhu2118 · peterzhu2118 · commit 550a49c913f6 · 2023-12-26T10:48:48.000-05:00
+==+ does not format properly, so we should use &lt;tt&gt;==&lt;/tt&gt; instead.
diff --git a/numeric.c b/numeric.c
@@ -1550,8 +1550,8 @@ rb_float_pow(VALUE x, VALUE y)
  *    1.eql?(Rational(1, 1)) # => false
  *    1.eql?(Complex(1, 0))  # => false
  *
- *  \Method +eql?+ is different from +==+ in that +eql?+ requires matching types,
- *  while +==+ does not.
+ *  \Method +eql?+ is different from <tt>==</tt> in that +eql?+ requires matching types,
+ *  while <tt>==</tt> does not.
  *
  */
 

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1550,8 +1550,8 @@ rb_float_pow(VALUE x, VALUE y)`
`1550`	`1550`	`* 1.eql?(Rational(1, 1)) # => false`
`1551`	`1551`	`* 1.eql?(Complex(1, 0)) # => false`
`1552`	`1552`	`*`
`1553`		`- * \Method +eql?+ is different from +==+ in that +eql?+ requires matching types,`
`1554`		`- * while +==+ does not.`
	`1553`	`+ * \Method +eql?+ is different from <tt>==</tt> in that +eql?+ requires matching types,`
	`1554`	`+ * while <tt>==</tt> does not.`
`1555`	`1555`	`*`
`1556`	`1556`	`*/`
`1557`	`1557`