SetRWConflict(reader, writer);
 }
 
-/*
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * We are about to add a RW-edge to the dependency graph - check that we don't
  * introduce a dangerous structure by doing so, and abort one of the
  * transactions if so.
  * in the dependency graph:
  *
  *             Tin ------> Tpivot ------> Tout
- *                       rw                     rw
+ *                       rw                     rw
  *
  * Furthermore, Tout must commit first.
  *
  * One more optimization is that if Tin is declared READ ONLY (or commits
  * without writing), we can only have a problem if Tout committed before Tin
  * acquired its snapshot.
+ *----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
 static void
 OnConflict_CheckForSerializationFailure(const SERIALIZABLEXACT *reader,
 
        failure = false;
 
-       /*
+       /*------------------------------------------------------------------------
         * Check for already-committed writer with rw-conflict out flagged
         * (conflict-flag on W means that T2 committed before W):
         *
         *              R ------> W ------> T2
-        *                      rw        rw
+        *                      rw                rw
         *
         * That is a dangerous structure, so we must abort. (Since the writer
         * has already committed, we must be the reader)
+        *------------------------------------------------------------------------
         */
        if (SxactIsCommitted(writer)
          && (SxactHasConflictOut(writer) || SxactHasSummaryConflictOut(writer)))
                failure = true;
 
-       /*
+       /*------------------------------------------------------------------------
         * Check whether the writer has become a pivot with an out-conflict
         * committed transaction (T2), and T2 committed first:
         *
         *              R ------> W ------> T2
-        *                      rw        rw
+        *                      rw                rw
         *
         * Because T2 must've committed first, there is no anomaly if:
         * - the reader committed before T2
         * - the writer committed before T2
         * - the reader is a READ ONLY transaction and the reader was concurrent
         *       with T2 (= reader acquired its snapshot before T2 committed)
+        *------------------------------------------------------------------------
         */
        if (!failure)
        {
                                && (!SxactIsCommitted(writer)
                                        || t2->commitSeqNo <= writer->commitSeqNo)
                                && (!SxactIsReadOnly(reader)
-                                       || t2->commitSeqNo <= reader->SeqNo.lastCommitBeforeSnapshot))
+                          || t2->commitSeqNo <= reader->SeqNo.lastCommitBeforeSnapshot))
                        {
                                failure = true;
                                break;
                }
        }
 
-       /*
+       /*------------------------------------------------------------------------
         * Check whether the reader has become a pivot with a committed writer:
         *
         *              T0 ------> R ------> W
-        *                       rw        rw
+        *                       rw                rw
         *
         * Because W must've committed first for an anomaly to occur, there is no
         * anomaly if:
         * - T0 committed before the writer
         * - T0 is READ ONLY, and overlaps the writer
+        *------------------------------------------------------------------------
         */
        if (!failure && SxactIsCommitted(writer) && !SxactIsReadOnly(reader))
        {
                                && (!SxactIsCommitted(t0)
                                        || t0->commitSeqNo >= writer->commitSeqNo)
                                && (!SxactIsReadOnly(t0)
-                                       || t0->SeqNo.lastCommitBeforeSnapshot >= writer->commitSeqNo))
+                          || t0->SeqNo.lastCommitBeforeSnapshot >= writer->commitSeqNo))
                        {
                                failure = true;
                                break;
        {
                /*
                 * We have to kill a transaction to avoid a possible anomaly from
-                * occurring. If the writer is us, we can just ereport() to cause
-                * a transaction abort. Otherwise we flag the writer for termination,
+                * occurring. If the writer is us, we can just ereport() to cause a
+                * transaction abort. Otherwise we flag the writer for termination,
                 * causing it to abort when it tries to commit. However, if the writer
                 * is a prepared transaction, already prepared, we can't abort it
                 * anymore, so we have to kill the reader instead.
                        ereport(ERROR,
                                        (errcode(ERRCODE_T_R_SERIALIZATION_FAILURE),
                                         errmsg("could not serialize access due to read/write dependencies among transactions"),
-                       errdetail("Cancelled on identification as a pivot, during write."),
+                                        errdetail("Cancelled on identification as a pivot, during write."),
                                         errhint("The transaction might succeed if retried.")));
                }
                else if (SxactIsPrepared(writer))