Formerly, the lack of any opclasses that could accept such data was enough
of a defense, but now with a "record" opclass we need to check more carefully.
(You can still use that opclass for an index, but you have to store a named
composite type not an anonymous one.)
to->attislocal = true;
ReleaseSysCache(tuple);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure the expression yields a type that's safe to store in
+ * an index. We need this defense because we have index opclasses
+ * for pseudo-types such as "record", and the actually stored type
+ * had better be safe; eg, a named composite type is okay, an
+ * anonymous record type is not. The test is the same as for
+ * whether a table column is of a safe type (which is why we
+ * needn't check for the non-expression case).
+ */
+ CheckAttributeType(NameStr(to->attname), to->atttypid);
}
/*