From 9606f4d2baf7b1de43e76617a9d45bb811847618 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Magnus Hagander Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:07:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Comment said we don't free the lockarray, and why. The proper fix is to make the code do what the comment says... --- src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c index 36cec88d40..bca3938b2e 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c @@ -918,8 +918,6 @@ destroy_ssl_system(void) * This means we leak a little memory on repeated load/unload * of the library. */ - free(pq_lockarray); - pq_lockarray = NULL; } } -- 2.39.5