When we have successfully optimized a MIN or MAX aggregate into an indexscan,
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:06:23 +0000 (19:06 +0000)
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:06:23 +0000 (19:06 +0000)
the query result must be exactly one row (since we don't do this when there's
any GROUP BY).  Therefore any ORDER BY or DISTINCT attached to the query is
useless and can be dropped.  Aside from saving useless cycles, this protects
us against problems with matching the hacked-up tlist entries to sort clauses,
as seen in a bug report from Taiki Yamaguchi.  We might need to work harder
if we ever try to optimize grouped queries with this approach, but this
solution will do for now.

src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c

index 2c22840fbdc74ade2f2dfd60890e841cce21e207..f37399a37a932eaca266ad64a56bf020ced2a079 100644 (file)
@@ -943,6 +943,17 @@ grouping_planner(PlannerInfo *root, double tuple_fraction)
                         * right tlist, and it has no sort order.
                         */
                        current_pathkeys = NIL;
+                       /*
+                        * In fact, since we don't optimize grouped aggregates, it
+                        * needs no sort order --- there must be exactly one output row,
+                        * and so any ORDER BY or DISTINCT attached to the query is
+                        * useless and can be dropped.  Aside from saving useless cycles,
+                        * this protects us against problems with matching the hacked-up
+                        * tlist entries to sort clauses.
+                        */
+                       Assert(!parse->groupClause);
+                       parse->sortClause = NULL;
+                       parse->distinctClause = NULL;
                }
                else
                {