Behave correctly if INSERT ... VALUES is decorated with additional clauses.

In versions 8.2 and up, the grammar allows attaching ORDER BY, LIMIT,
FOR UPDATE, or WITH to VALUES, and hence to INSERT ... VALUES.  But the
special-case code for VALUES in transformInsertStmt() wasn't expecting any
of those, and just ignored them, leading to unexpected results.  Rather
than complicate the special-case path, just ensure that the presence of any
of those clauses makes us treat the query as if it had a general SELECT.
Per report from Hitoshi Harada.

diff --git a/src/backend/parser/analyze.c b/src/backend/parser/analyze.c
index 0a93ec70b0c6a0c4d31bdd2f1f2f8ccd1ba22807..21342e8a9d7f5535ae3a5a016d3c122d0229491e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/parser/analyze.c
+++ b/src/backend/parser/analyze.c
@@ -347,8 +347,17 @@ transformInsertStmt(ParseState *pstate, InsertStmt *stmt)
     * We have three cases to deal with: DEFAULT VALUES (selectStmt == NULL),
     * VALUES list, or general SELECT input.  We special-case VALUES, both for
     * efficiency and so we can handle DEFAULT specifications.
+    *
+    * The grammar allows attaching ORDER BY, LIMIT, FOR UPDATE, or WITH to a
+    * VALUES clause.  If we have any of those, treat it as a general SELECT;
+    * so it will work, but you can't use DEFAULT items together with those.
     */
-   isGeneralSelect = (selectStmt && selectStmt->valuesLists == NIL);
+   isGeneralSelect = (selectStmt && (selectStmt->valuesLists == NIL ||
+                                     selectStmt->sortClause != NIL ||
+                                     selectStmt->limitOffset != NULL ||
+                                     selectStmt->limitCount != NULL ||
+                                     selectStmt->lockingClause != NIL ||
+                                     selectStmt->withClause != NULL));
 
    /*
     * If a non-nil rangetable/namespace was passed in, and we are doing