Document further community-operated services #674
Labels
No labels
Codeberg Pages
Documentation Usability
Forgejo
Good First Issue! 👋
Kind: Bug
Kind: Documentation
Kind: Enhancement
Kind: Feature
Kind: Question
Kind: Security
Licensing
Part: Generator
Priority: High
Priority: Low
Priority: Medium
Reviewed: Confirmed
Reviewed: Duplicate
Reviewed: Invalid
Reviewed: Wontfix
Status: Blocked
Status: Help wanted
Status: In progress
Status: Needs feedback
Status: Ready for Review
Status: Review
Status: Stale
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Codeberg/Documentation#674
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Sometimes, people make services that can communicate with Codeberg (either deliberately or by coincidence) – we should document such alternatives to encourage more "indie web"-type of creativity and to reduce the pressure on ourselves, should one of our services not meet a user's expectations or demands.
Example: @whitequark's https://grebedoc.dev/
I now consider https://grebedoc.dev/ feature-complete and production-ready, so I'd be happy to have it documented somewhere!
Maybe some visible links to the delightful list or its subsections may deduplicate work? There is an extensive overview of alternative services, tools, etc.